UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549




FORM 10-K



[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011

[   ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ________ to ________

Commission file number    0-21221

MicroVision, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 
Delaware
91-1600822
  (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

6222 185th Ave NE
Redmond, Washington    98052

(Address of Principal Executive Offices including Zip Code)

(425) 936-6847
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

Title of each class

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $.001 par value

NASDAQ Global Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer as defined in Rule 405 of the Act. Yes o  No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o  No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files. Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer    ¨

Accelerated filer    x

Non-accelerated filer    ¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company    ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No x

The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2011 was approximately $131.8 million (based on the closing price for the registrant's Common Stock on the NASDAQ Global Market of $9.76 per share, as adjusted for the reverse stock split discussed herein).

The number of shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding as of March 1, 2012 was 17,019,000.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Portions of the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with the registrant's 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated herein by reference into Part III of this report.



MicroVision, Inc.
2011 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I.

 

Page

   Item 1.

Description of Business

2

   Item 1A.

Risk Factors

8

   Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

14

   Item 2.

Properties

14

   Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

14

   Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

14

   Item 4A.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

14

Part II.

 

 

   Item 5.

Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securites

15

   Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

16

   Item 7.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

17

   Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks

28

   Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

28

   Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

54

   Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

54

   Item 9B.

Other Information

54

Part III.

 

 

   Item 10.

Directors and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

54

   Item 11.

Executive Compensation

54

   Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

55

   Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

55

   Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

55

Part IV.

 

 

   Item 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

56

Signatures

  

58

PART I

Preliminary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and is subject to the safe harbor created by those sections. Such statements may include, but are not limited to, projections of revenues, income or loss, capital expenditures, plans for product development and cooperative arrangements, technology development by third parties, future operations, financing needs or plans of MicroVision, as well as assumptions relating to the foregoing. The words "anticipate," "could," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "goal," "may," "plan," "project," "will," and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in our forward-looking statements include the following: our ability to obtain financing; market acceptance of our technologies and products; our financial and technical resources relative to those of our competitors; our ability to keep up with rapid technological change; government regulation of our technologies; our ability to enforce our intellectual property rights and protect our proprietary technologies; the ability to obtain additional contract awards and to develop partnership opportunities; the timing of commercial product launches; the ability to achieve key technical milestones in key products; and other risk factors identified below in Item 1A.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Overview

We are developing high-resolution miniature laser display and imaging engines based upon our proprietary PicoP® display engine technology. Our PicoP technology utilizes our widely patented expertise in two dimensional Micro-Electrical Mechanical Systems (MEMS), lasers, optics, and electronics to create a high quality video or still image from a small form factor device with lower power needs than conventional display technologies. Our strategy is to develop and supply PicoP display engines directly or through licensing arrangements to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) that would embed them into a variety of consumer, automotive, enterprise and industrial products.

The primary objective for consumer applications is to provide users of mobile consumer devices such as smartphones, media players, tablet PCs and other consumer electronics products with a large screen viewing experience produced by a small embedded projector. These potential products would allow users to watch movies and videos, play video games, and display images and other data onto a variety of surfaces, freeing users from the limitations of a small, palm-sized screen. The PicoP could be further modified to be embedded into a pair of glasses to provide the mobile user with a see-through or occluded personal display to view movies, play games or access other content.

The PicoP with some modification could be embedded into a vehicle or integrated into a portable standalone aftermarket device to create a high-resolution head-up display (HUD) that could project point-by-point navigation, critical operational, safety and other information important to the vehicle operator.

The enterprise products employing our technology would allow users in field-based professions such as service repair or sales to view and share information such as schematics for equipment repair and sales data and orders within CRM applications on a larger, more user-friendly interface. We also see potential for embedding the PicoP laser display engine in industrial products where our displays could be used for 3D measuring and digital signage, enhancing the overall user experience of these applications.

We currently market and sell our SHOWWX™ line of accessory pico projectors that use our PicoP display engine through a network of global distributors. We continue to enter into a limited number of development agreements with commercial and U.S. government customers to develop advanced prototypes and demonstration units based on our light scanning technologies.

We develop and procure intellectual property rights relating to our technologies as a key aspect of our business strategy. We generate intellectual property from our ongoing performance on development contracts and our internal research and development activities. We also have acquired exclusive rights to various technologies under licensing and acquisition agreements.

2


Technology

Our patented PicoP display engine technology includes a single-mirror MEMS scanner, laser light sources, electronics, and optics combined using our proprietary system control expertise, gained through years of internal research and development. Our bi-directional MEMS scanning mirror is a key component of our technology platform and is one of our core competencies. Our MEMS design is a silicon device with a tiny mirror at the center. This mirror is connected to small flexures which allow it to oscillate vertically and horizontally to capture (imaging) or reproduce (display) an image pixel-by-pixel. Our PicoP display engines create a brilliant, full color, high contrast, uniform display over the entire field of view, from a small and thin package. We believe that our proprietary PicoP display engine technology offers significant advantages over traditional display and imaging systems. Depending on the specific product application, these advantages may include:

  • Small and thin package size
  • High brightness and contrast with 100% brightness uniformity
  • Rich, saturated color reproduction
  • Higher resolution
  • Clear text readability
  • Reduced power requirements
  • Simple optical design that does not require complex focusing lenses
  • Lower price at volume

Our PicoP display engine currently uses red and blue laser diodes and a frequency-doubled "synthetic" green laser to create a full color image. Synthetic green lasers are infrared lasers that are manipulated to reduce their wavelength to produce a green light. This conversion process creates a complex system of multiple components held to tight tolerances making manufacturing more challenging. Historically, availability of synthetic green lasers has been constrained due to their complexity and the existence of only one or two manufacturers.

During 2011, we simplified our operations to significantly reduce our 2011 cash requirements through a combination of measures as part of our strategy to focus our efforts on development of the next-generation of our PicoP technology based on direct green lasers. Direct green lasers are capable of producing green light natively, greatly simplifying laser design and manufacturing. Direct green lasers are expected to be manufactured in a manner similar to red and blue laser diodes available today, facilitating lower cost and rapid scalability to commercial quantities and are expected to be introduced by at least one manufacturer by mid-2012. At least five companies worldwide have announced they are developing direct green lasers for commercial introduction.

We have begun to provide samples of the new PicoP engine to OEMs for evaluation and plan to introduce our next-generation PicoP display engine using direct green lasers during 2012 to enable our prospective OEM partners to launch their product using the PicoP technology. The combination of smaller size, lower power, and lower cost make direct green lasers an attractive alternative to synthetic green lasers for use in our PicoP display engine. We have integrated direct green laser samples from three laser manufacturers into prototypes of our next-generation PicoP display engine.

Business Strategy

Our business strategy is to promote our technology in the form of integrated and embedded components to leading OEMs for widespread use in display and imaging product applications. Presently, we are focused on the following steps to implement our business strategy:

  • Market and sell accessory projectors and planned future products, through multiple sales channels including distributors and OEMs.
  • Continue rapid advancement of our technology platform and value-add applications.
  • Partner with original design manufacturers (ODMs) and Tier 1 suppliers to produce advanced prototypes and demonstration units using our PicoP display engines, to market the benefits of our technology by us or our partners to OEM customers while minimizing our own development costs.
  • Target leading OEMs to integrate our PicoP technology into their products.

3


We have entered into a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Pioneer Corporation. The MOU establishes the framework for a manufacturing and commercial distribution agreement with Pioneer for display engine subsystems to be used in consumer, after-market and embedded automotive products. We have collaborated with Pioneer to develop a laser light source module using direct red, blue, and green laser diodes and a separate display engine subsystem which is based on our PicoP technology. Pioneer has announced that it intends to introduce a commercial in-vehicle head-up display product using the module into the consumer market in 2012.

Marketing Focus:

Pico Projector Displays

The use of mobile devices worldwide has grown significantly in the last decade and consumers' awareness and willingness to use mobile devices for data services has increased dramatically over the last few years. Applications such as email, web-browsing, downloading and playing of videos, social networking and mobile gaming are driving the demand for more capable smartphones and other mobile devices such as tablets. Typically, these devices have small screens which limit the utility and enjoyment of the content, especially in small group settings. We believe that pico projectors can free mobile device users from the limitations of a palm-sized or tablet-sized screen and provide a large screen viewing experience to increase the usefulness and enjoyment of watching movies and videos, mobile gaming, and displaying images and many other applications.

We are working with OEMs and others to produce and distribute PicoP-based products. We currently market and sell our SHOWWX™ line of accessory pico projectors, which use our PicoP display engine. The SHOWWX products are battery operated plug-and-play projectors that can project a full color, WVGA (848 X 480 pixels), DVD-quality image with vivid colors and exceptional contrast that is always in focus. The SHOWWX+ is a "Made for iPod, iPhone, and iPad" product. We also sell our PicoP display engine to OEM customers to embed into their products. Our accessory projector products and PicoP display engines are manufactured by a high volume contract manufacturer.

Vehicle Displays

We believe an automotive head-up display (HUD) improves driver safety by eliminating the driver's need to look away from the road to read information such as GPS mapping images, audio controls and other automobile instrumentation. Working independently and with Tier 1 suppliers, we have produced prototypes that demonstrate our PicoP's ability to project high-resolution images onto the windshield of an automobile, providing the driver with a variety of information related to the car's operation. We believe that an automotive HUD based on our PicoP technology offers three distinct advantages over competing head-up displays:

  • Size - Our prototype display is less than half the size of current competitive offerings. This smaller form factor can accommodate a wider variety of vehicle configurations.
  • Contrast Ratio - Our prototype has a contrast ratio an order of magnitude higher than current competitive offerings. The high contrast ratio allows the driver to see the display clearly day or night, in any ambient lighting conditions.
  • Installation Cost - Our prototype can be electronically customized to match the unique curvature of a particular automobile's windshield, thereby reducing installation time and cost. The current competitive offerings must be manually adjusted to match the curvature of a windshield.

Working independently and with various ODMs and Tier 1 automotive suppliers, we have developed PicoP-enabled HUD prototypes and are working to market them to OEM customers. We expect that our PicoP display engine subsystem could be integrated by a Tier 1 supplier into their HUD product package for sale to automobile manufacturers or by a product integrator into an aftermarket product for direct sale to their customers for use in automobiles, specialty vehicles, trucks, buses and motor coaches.

4


During 2011, we worked with Pioneer Corporation to develop a light source module based on direct red, blue, and green laser diodes and display engine subsystems which would serve as the basis for an in-vehicle HUD product targeted for commercial introduction by Pioneer in 2012.

Wearable Displays

We believe our PicoP technology can be integrated with a light-weight optical design to create a full color near-eye wearable display platform. This wearable display platform could be in the form of ruggedized helmet mounted display systems or lightweight fashionable eyewear. Wearable displays could be used to provide personal viewing of information from a mobile device through a wired or wireless connection. We believe that PicoP based wearable displays could provide the following advantages over competing wearable display technologies:

  • See-through performance - See-through eyewear displays enable interaction with the real world and one's personal mobile services at the same time. Unlike competing wearable displays, a see-through display does not obstruct the wearer's vision or reduce awareness of what is happening around them.
  • Daylight readability - The high-brightness capability of color eyewear based on the PicoP display engine enables images to be clearly visible in brightly lit ambient environments, including direct sunlight. Current LCD-based head worn displays are difficult to see in bright light environments.
  • Fashion and ergonomics - We are developing thin and lightweight optics that can be integrated with the PicoP display engine so that our OEM partners can design wearable displays that match conventional eyewear frames in size and weight and provide significantly improved ergonomics compared to competing wearable displays.

We have worked with the U.S. military and commercial customers to further develop the optical design and integration of the PicoP display engine for military applications such as helmet mounted displays and full color see-through eyewear. We plan to work with OEMs and system integrators to incorporate the PicoP display engine into integrated solutions for potential military and commercial customers.

Bar Code Scanners

We currently sell our ROV hand held bar code scanners, which use our proprietary MEMS technology, and bar code scanner enabled enterprise solutions. In the second half of 2009, we reduced our sales and marketing efforts on the bar code product and we do not expect to increase our investment in the bar code product in the future.

Go-To-Market Strategy

We are evaluating opportunities to widely market our technology using a variety of distribution channels such as establishing partnerships with OEMs and distributors. Products using our technology may carry the MicroVision brand or be branded and distributed by our OEM or distribution partners.

Certain potential applications using the PicoP display engines, such as an automotive HUD or pico projection for tablet PCs and mobile phones, require integration of our engine into other technologies. In markets requiring high volume production of the PicoP display engine components or subsystems that are to be integrated with other components, we plan to provide designs for components, subsystems and systems to OEMs under licensing agreements.

We expect that some customers will require unique designs for their products. We expect that such relationships will generally involve a period of co-development during which our customer's engineering, manufacturing and marketing teams would work with our technical staff to modify the PicoP display engine for their targeted market and application. We may charge fees to our customers to fund the costs of the engineering effort incurred on such development projects. The nature of these relationships may vary from partner to partner depending on the proposed specifications for the PicoP display engine, the product to be developed, and the customers' design, manufacturing and distribution capabilities. We believe that by limiting our own direct manufacturing investment for products, we will reduce our capital requirements and risks inherent in taking the PicoP display engine to the consumer market.

5


To date, the majority of our revenue from pico projection products has been generated primarily through sales of our accessory projectors through distributors and OEM customers, and to a lesser extent directly to end users through our online store. In the future, we expect a larger percentage of our revenue to come from embedded engines sold to OEMs, ODMs and other product integrators, as well as from royalties associated with licensing reference designs for components, subsystems, and systems under licensing agreements.

Human Factors, Ergonomics and Safety

We conduct ongoing research on safety factors that must be addressed by products incorporating our technology, including such issues as the maximum permissible laser exposure limits established by International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) and others. Independent experts have concluded that laser exposure to the eye resulting from use of the light scanning displays under normal operating conditions would be below the calculated maximum permissible exposure level set by IEC. Our accessory pico projectors products are currently Class 2 laser products, which are products safe for use by consumers.

In addition, we work with and commission third party independent experts in the field of laser safety to assist in meeting safety specifications as requested by our customers.

Competitive Conditions

The information display industry is highly competitive. Our potential display products will compete with established manufacturers of mature display technologies such as miniaturized cathode ray tube and flat panel display devices, as well as companies developing new display technologies. Our competitors include companies such as Texas Instruments Incorporated, 3M, and Light Blue Optics Ltd. in the pico projection display segment and Nippon Seiki, Yazaki Corporation and Johnson Controls Incorporated in the vehicle displays segment, most of which have much greater financial, technical and other resources than we do. Many of our competitors are developing alternative miniature display technologies. Our competitors may succeed in developing information display technologies and products that could render our technology or our proposed products commercially infeasible or technologically obsolete.

Pico projectors are an emerging class of miniature projectors that are generally handheld, battery operated, mobile projectors. Most of the competing projectors currently on the market use either liquid crystal on silicon (LCOS) panel solutions or Texas Instruments' DLP™ display technology, using primarily light emitting diode light sources. Each of these solutions can create images from a small form factor of varying resolution, brightness, image quality, battery life, and ease of use.

The information display industry has been characterized by rapid and significant technological advances. Our technology and potential products may not remain competitive with such advances, and we may not have sufficient funds to invest in new technologies, products or processes. Although we believe our technology platform and proposed display products could deliver images of a substantially better quality and resolution from a smaller form factor device than those of commercially available miniaturized liquid crystal displays and cathode ray tube based display products, manufacturers of liquid crystal displays and cathode ray tubes may develop further improvements of screen display technology that could reduce or eliminate the anticipated advantages of our proposed products.

We compete with other companies in the display industry and other technologies for government funding. In general, our government customers plan to integrate our technology into larger systems. Ongoing contracts are awarded based on our past performance on government contracts, the customer's progress in integrating our technology into the customer's overall program objectives, and the status of the customer's overall program.

Intellectual Property and Proprietary Rights

We generate intellectual property from our ongoing performance on development contracts, our internal research and development activities and technology acquisitions. The inventions covered by our patent applications generally relate to component miniaturization, specific implementation of various system components and design elements to facilitate mass production. Protecting these key enabling technologies and components is a fundamental aspect of our strategy to penetrate diverse markets with unique products. As such, we intend to continue to develop our portfolio of proprietary and patented technologies at the system, component and process levels.

6


We believe our extensive and highly-rated patent portfolio is the largest, broadest and earliest filed laser pico projection and display portfolio and includes applications such as automotive head-up display, range finding, portable media devices, image capture and laptop applications. MicroVision's total patent count exceeds 500 issued patents, pending patents and licensed patents worldwide.

Since our inception in 1993, we have acquired under license agreements exclusive rights to various technologies, including, among others, rights related to the ability to superimpose images on the user's field of view and with a retinal display, and rights related to the design and fabrication of micro miniature devices using semiconductor fabrication techniques. In some cases, the licensors have retained limited, non-commercial rights with respect to the technology, including the right to use the technology for non-commercial research and for instructional purposes.

Our ability to compete effectively in the display and image capture market will depend, in part, on our ability to maintain the proprietary nature of these technologies.

We also rely on unpatented proprietary technology. To protect our rights in these areas, we require all employees and, where appropriate, contractors, consultants, advisors and collaborators, to enter into confidentiality and non-compete agreements. There can be no assurance, however, that these agreements will provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information in the event of any unauthorized use, misappropriation or disclosure of such trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information.

Among the marks we have registered are "PicoP," "MicroHud" and the "tri-curve" logo with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. We have filed for registration of various other marks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

Additional Information

We perform research and development to design and develop our technology platform and modifications to the PicoP display engine that will be required for specific applications. Research and development expense for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009 was $15.3 million, $21.6 million, and $24.6 million, respectively. In 2011, 77% of our revenue was generated from product sales, and 6% and 17% of revenue was derived from performance on development contracts with the U.S government and commercial customers, respectively. One commercial customer accounted for 11% of our revenue in 2011. In 2010, 81% of our revenue was generated from product sales, 4% and 15% of revenue was derived from performance on development contracts with the U.S. government and commercial customers, respectively. One commercial customer accounted for 26% of total revenue in 2010. Prior to 2010, most of our revenue was generated from development contracts to develop our technology to meet customer specifications for both the U.S. government and commercial enterprises. In 2009, 43% and 31% of revenue was derived from performance on development contracts with the U.S. government and commercial customers, respectively, and the remainder from sales of bar code scanner and SHOWWX units. Two government customers accounted for 24% and 17%, respectively, of total revenue in 2009. Our contracts with the U.S. government can be terminated for convenience by the U.S. government at any time. See Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

We had a backlog of $2.1 million at December 31, 2011 compared to a backlog of $13.7 million at December 31, 2010. The backlog at December 31, 2011 is composed of $624,000 in development contracts and orders for prototype units and evaluation kits, and $1.4 million in orders for PicoP display engines, accessory pico projectors, and ROV units. We plan to complete all of the backlog contracts within one year.

Employees

As of March 1, 2012, we had approximately 103 employees.

Further Information

MicroVision was founded in 1993 as a Washington corporation and reincorporated in 2003 under the laws of the State of Delaware. Our principal office is located at 6222 185th Avenue NE, Redmond WA 98052 and our telephone number is 425-936-6847.

7


Our Internet address is www.microvision.com. We make available free of charge our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Investors can access this material by visiting our website, clicking on "Investors" and then on "SEC Filings."

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Risk Factors Relating to the MicroVision Business

We have a history of operating losses and expect to incur significant losses in the future.

We have had substantial losses since our inception. We cannot assure you that we will ever become or remain profitable.

  • As of December 31, 2011, we had an accumulated deficit of $414.8 million.
  • We incurred consolidated net losses of $292.0 million from inception through 2008, $39.5 million in 2009, $47.5 million in 2010, and $35.8 million in 2011.

The likelihood of our success must be considered in light of the expenses, difficulties and delays frequently encountered by companies formed to develop and market new technologies. In particular, our operations to date have focused primarily on research and development of our technology platform and development of demonstration units. We are unable to accurately estimate future revenues and operating expenses based upon historical performance.

We cannot be certain that we will succeed in obtaining additional development contracts or that we will be able to obtain substantial customer orders for our products. In light of these factors, we expect to continue to incur substantial losses and negative cash flow at least through 2012 and likely thereafter. We cannot be certain that we will achieve positive cash flow at any time in the future.

We will require additional capital to fund our operations and to implement our business plan. If we do not obtain additional capital, we may be required to curtail our operations substantially. Raising additional capital may dilute the value of current shareholders' shares.

Based on our current operating plan, we anticipate that we have sufficient cash and cash equivalents to fund our operations through June 2012. We will require additional cash to fund our operating plan past that time. We are introducing new products into an emerging market which creates significant uncertainty about our ability to accurately project revenue, costs and cash flows. If the level of sales anticipated by our financial plan is not achieved or our working capital requirements are higher than planned, we will need to raise additional cash sooner or take actions to reduce operating expenses. We plan to obtain additional cash through the issuance of equity or debt securities.

Our capital requirements will depend on many factors, including, but not limited to, payment terms with suppliers and the rate at which we can, directly or through arrangements with original equipment manufacturers, introduce products incorporating the PicoP display engine and image capture technologies and the market acceptance and competitive position of such products. If revenues are less than we anticipate, if the mix of revenues varies from anticipated amounts or if expenses exceed the amounts budgeted, we may require additional capital earlier than expected to fund our operations. In addition, our operating plan provides for the development of strategic relationships with systems and equipment manufacturers that may require additional investments by us.

Additional capital may not be available to us, or if available, on terms acceptable to us or on a timely basis. Raising additional capital may involve issuing securities with rights and preferences that are senior to our common stock and may dilute the value of current shareholders' shares. If adequate funds are not available on a timely basis we intend to consider limiting our operations substantially to extend out funds as we pursue other financing opportunities and business relationships. This limitation of operations could include reducing our planned investment in working capital to fund growth and delaying development projects resulting in reductions in staff and operating costs as well as reductions in capital expenditures and investment in research and development.

8


If we cannot manufacture products at competitive prices, our financial results will be adversely affected.

We are currently negotiating component pricing with suppliers for our current and future products. The cost per unit for PicoP-based accessory projectors currently exceeds the level at which we could expect to profitably sell these products. If we cannot lower our cost of production, we may face increased demands on our financial resources, possibly requiring additional equity and/or debt financing to sustain our business operations.

We are dependent on third parties in order to develop, manufacture, sell and market our products.

Our strategy for commercializing our technology and products incorporating the PicoP display engine includes entering into cooperative development, manufacturing, sales and marketing arrangements with corporate partners, original equipment manufacturers and other third parties. We cannot be certain that we will be able to negotiate arrangements on acceptable terms, if at all, or that these arrangements will be successful in yielding commercially viable products. If we cannot establish these arrangements, we would require additional capital to undertake such activities on our own and would require extensive manufacturing, sales and marketing expertise that we do not currently possess and that may be difficult to obtain. In addition, we could encounter significant delays in introducing the PicoP display engine or find that the development, manufacture or sale of products incorporating the PicoP display engine would not be feasible. To the extent that we enter into cooperative development, sales and marketing or other joint venture arrangements, our revenues will depend upon the performance of third parties. We cannot be certain that any such arrangements will be successful.

We cannot be certain that our technology platform or products incorporating our PicoP display engine will achieve market acceptance. If products incorporating the PicoP display engine do not achieve market acceptance, our revenues may not grow.

Our success will depend in part on customer acceptance of the PicoP display engine. The PicoP display engine may not be accepted by manufacturers who use display technologies in their products, by systems integrators who incorporate our products into their products or by end users of these products. To be accepted, the PicoP display engine must meet the expectations of our potential customers in the consumer, defense, industrial, and medical markets. If our technology fails to achieve market acceptance, we may not be able to continue to develop our technology platform.

Our planned future products are dependent on advances in technology by other companies.

We rely on and will continue to rely on technologies, such as light sources, MEMS and optical components that are developed and produced by other companies. The commercial success of certain of our planned future products will depend in part on advances in these and other technologies by other companies. We may, from time to time, contract with and support companies developing key technologies in order to accelerate the development of them for our specific uses. There are no guarantees that such activities will result in useful technologies or components for us.

We are dependent on a small number of customers for our revenue. Our quarterly performance may vary substantially and this variance, as well as general market conditions, may cause our stock price to fluctuate greatly and potentially expose us to litigation.

Since 2010, most of our revenues have been generated from product sales to a limited number of customers and distribution partners. Our quarterly operating results may vary significantly based on:

  • commercial acceptance of our PicoP-based products;
  • the rate at which our distributors can achieve sell through of our products;
  • changes in evaluations and recommendations by any securities analysts following our stock or our industry generally;
  • announcements by other companies in our industry;
  • changes in business or regulatory conditions;
  • announcements or implementation by our competitors of technological innovations or new products;
  • the status of particular development programs and the timing of performance under specific development agreements;
  • economic and stock market conditions; or
  • other factors unrelated to our company or industry.

In one or more future quarters, our results of operations may fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors and the trading price of our common stock may decline as a consequence. In addition, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company's securities, shareholders often have instituted securities class action litigation against that company. If we become involved in a class action suit, it could divert the attention of management, and, if adversely determined, could require us to pay substantial damages.

9


We or our customers may fail to perform under open orders, which could adversely affect our operating results and cash flows. 

Our backlog of open orders totaled $2.1 million as of December 31, 2011. We may be unable to meet the performance requirements, including performance specifications or delivery dates, required by such purchase orders.  Further, our customers may be unable or unwilling to perform their obligations there under on a timely basis or at all if, among other reasons, our products and technologies do not achieve market acceptance, our customers' products and technologies do not achieve market acceptance or our customers otherwise fail to achieve their operating goals.  To the extent we are unable to perform under such purchase orders or to the extent customers are unable or unwilling to perform, our operating results and cash flows could be adversely affected.

It may become more difficult to sell our stock in the public market.

Our common stock is listed for quotation on The NASDAQ Global Market. To keep our listing on this market, we must meet NASDAQ's listing maintenance standards. If we are unable to continue to meet NASDAQ's listing maintenance standards, our common stock could be delisted from The NASDAQ Global Market. If our common stock were delisted, we likely would seek to list the common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market, the American Stock Exchange or on a regional stock exchange. Listing on such other market or exchange could reduce the liquidity of our common stock. If our common stock were not listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market or an exchange, trading of our common stock would be conducted in the over-the-counter market on an electronic bulletin board established for unlisted securities or directly through market makers in our common stock. If our common stock were to trade in the over-the-counter market, an investor would find it more difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations for the price of, the common stock. A delisting from The NASDAQ Global Market and failure to obtain listing on such other market or exchange would subject our securities to so-called penny stock rules that impose additional sales practice and market-making requirements on broker-dealers who sell or make a market in such securities. Consequently, removal from The NASDAQ Global Market and failure to obtain listing on another market or exchange could affect the ability or willingness of broker-dealers to sell or make a market in our common stock and the ability of purchasers of our common stock to sell their securities in the secondary market. In addition, when the market price of our common stock is less than $5.00 per share, we become subject to penny stock rules even if our common stock is still listed on The NASDAQ Global Market. While the penny stock rules should not affect the quotation of our common stock on The NASDAQ Global Market, these rules may further limit the market liquidity of our common stock and the ability of investors to sell our common stock in the secondary market. The market price of our stock has mostly traded below $5.00 per share during 2011, 2010, and 2009. On March 1, 2012, the closing price of our stock was $3.02.

Our lack of financial and technical resources relative to our competitors may limit our revenues, potential profits, overall market share or value.

Our current products and potential future products will compete with established manufacturers of existing products and companies developing new technologies. Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial, technical and other resources than we have. Because of their greater resources, our competitors may develop products or technologies that are superior to our own. The introduction of superior competing products or technologies could result in reduced revenues, lower margins or loss of market share, any of which could reduce the value of our business.

We may not be able to keep up with rapid technological change and our financial results may suffer.

The information display industry has been characterized by rapidly changing technology, accelerated product obsolescence and continuously evolving industry standards. Our success will depend upon our ability to further develop our technology platform and to cost effectively introduce new products and features in a timely manner to meet evolving customer requirements and compete with competitors' product advances.

We may not succeed in these efforts because of:

  • delays in product development;
  • lack of market acceptance for our products; or
  • lack of funds to invest in product development and marketing.

The occurrence of any of the above factors could result in decreased revenues, market share and value.

10


We could face lawsuits related to our use of the PicoP display engine or other technologies. Defending these suits would be costly and time consuming. An adverse outcome in any such matter could limit our ability to commercialize our technology and products, reduce our revenues and increase our operating expenses.

We are aware of several patents held by third parties that relate to certain aspects of light scanning displays and image capture products. These patents could be used as a basis to challenge the validity, limit the scope or limit our ability to obtain additional or broader patent rights of our patents or patents we have licensed. A successful challenge to the validity of our patents or patents we have licensed could limit our ability to commercialize our technology and the PicoP display engine and, consequently, materially reduce our revenues. Moreover, we cannot be certain that patent holders or other third parties will not claim infringement by us with respect to current and future technology. Because U.S. patent applications are held and examined in secrecy, it is also possible that presently pending U.S. applications will eventually be issued with claims that will be infringed by our products or our technology. The defense and prosecution of a patent suit would be costly and time consuming, even if the outcome were ultimately favorable to us. An adverse outcome in the defense of a patent suit could subject us to significant costs, to require others and us to cease selling products that incorporate the PicoP display engine, to cease licensing our technology or to require disputed rights to be licensed from third parties. Such licenses, if available, would increase our operating expenses. Moreover, if claims of infringement are asserted against our future co-development partners or customers, those partners or customers may seek indemnification from us for damages or expenses they incur.

If we fail to manage expansion effectively, our revenue and expenses could be adversely affected.

Our ability to successfully offer products and implement our business plan in a rapidly evolving market requires an effective planning and management process. The growth in business and relationships with customers and other third parties has placed, and will continue to place, a significant strain on our management systems and resources. We will need to continue to improve our financial and managerial controls, reporting systems and procedures and will need to continue to train and manage our work force.

Our products may be subject to future health and safety regulations that could increase our development and production costs.

Products incorporating the PicoP display engine could become subject to new health and safety regulations that would reduce our ability to commercialize the PicoP display engine. Compliance with any such new regulations would likely increase our cost to develop and produce products using the PicoP display engine and adversely affect our financial results.

Our dependence on sales to distributors increases the risks of managing our supply chain and may result in excess inventory or inventory shortages.

We expect the majority of our distributor relationships for our accessory pico projector and its accessories to involve the distributor taking inventory positions and reselling to multiple customers. With these distributor relationships, we would not recognize revenue until the distributors sell the product through to their end user customers. Our distributor relationships may reduce our ability to forecast sales and increases risks to our business. Since our distributors would act as intermediaries between us and the end user customers, we would be required to rely on our distributors to accurately report inventory levels and production forecasts. This may require us to manage a more complex supply chain and monitor the financial condition and credit worthiness of our distributors and the end user customers. Our failure to manage one or more of these risks could result in excess inventory or shortages that could adversely impact our operating results and financial condition.

Our future growth will suffer if we do not achieve sufficient market acceptance of our products to compete effectively.

Our success depends, in part, on our ability to gain acceptance of our current and future products by a large number of customers. Achieving market acceptance for our products will require marketing efforts and the expenditure of financial and other resources to create product awareness and demand by potential customers. We may be unable to offer products consistently, or at all, that compete effectively with products of others on the basis of price or performance. Failure to achieve broad acceptance of our products by potential customers and to effectively compete would have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

11


Our operating results may be adversely impacted by worldwide political and economic uncertainties and specific conditions in the markets we address.

In the recent past, general worldwide economic conditions have experienced a downturn due to slower economic activity, concerns about inflation, increased energy costs, decreased consumer confidence, reduced corporate profits and capital spending, and adverse business conditions. Any continuation or worsening of the current global economic and financial conditions could materially adversely affect (i) our ability to raise, or the cost of, needed capital, (ii) demand for our current and future products and (iii) our ability to commercialize products. We cannot predict the timing, strength, or duration of any economic slowdown or subsequent economic recovery, worldwide, or in the display industry.

Because we plan to continue using foreign contract manufacturers, our operating results could be harmed by economic, political, regulatory and other factors in foreign countries.

We currently use a contract manufacturer in Asia to manufacture our accessory pico projector product, and we plan to use foreign manufacturers to manufacture future products, where appropriate. These international operations are subject to inherent risks, which may adversely affect us, including:

  • political and economic instability;
  • high levels of inflation, historically the case in a number of countries in Asia;
  • burdens and costs of compliance with a variety of foreign laws;
  • foreign taxes;
  • changes in tariff rates or other trade and monetary policies; and
  • changes or volatility in currency exchange rates.

If we have to qualify a new contract manufacturer or foundry for our products, we may experience delays that result in lost revenues and damaged customer relationships.

We rely on single suppliers to manufacture our PicoP display engine, our SHOWWX products and our MEMS chips in wafer form. The lead time required to establish a relationship with a new contract manufacturer or foundry is long, and it takes time to adapt a product's design to a particular manufacturer's processes. Accordingly, there is no readily available alternative source of supply for these products and components in high volumes. This could cause significant delays in shipping products if we have to change our source of supply and manufacture quickly, which may result in lost revenues and damaged customer relationships.

If we experience delays or failures in developing commercially viable products, we may have lower revenues.

We have begun sales of units incorporating the PicoP display engine. However, we must undertake additional research, development and testing before we are able to develop additional products for commercial sale. Product development delays by us or our potential product development partners, or the inability to enter into relationships with these partners, may delay or prevent us from introducing products for commercial sale. We intend to rely on third-party developments or to contract with other companies to continue development of green laser devices we will need for our products.

Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to secure significant third-party manufacturing resources.

We are developing our capability to manufacture products in commercial quantities. Our success depends, in part, on our ability to provide our components and future products in commercial quantities at competitive prices. Accordingly, we will be required to obtain access, through business partners or contract manufacturers, to manufacturing capacity and processes for the commercial production of our expected future products. We cannot be certain that we will successfully obtain access to sufficient manufacturing resources. Future manufacturing limitations of our suppliers could result in a limitation on the number of products incorporating our technology that we are able to produce.

If our licensors and we are unable to obtain effective intellectual property protection for our products and technology, we may be unable to compete with other companies.

Intellectual property protection for our products is important and uncertain. If we do not obtain effective intellectual property protection for our products, processes and technology, we may be subject to increased competition. Our commercial success will depend in part on our ability and the ability of our licensors to maintain the proprietary nature of the PicoP display and other key technologies by securing valid and enforceable patents and effectively maintaining unpatented technology as trade secrets. We try to protect our proprietary technology by seeking to obtain United States and foreign patents in our name, or licenses to third-party patents,

12


related to proprietary technology, inventions, and improvements that may be important to the development of our business. However, our patent position and the patent position of our licensors involve complex legal and factual questions. The standards that the United States Patent and Trademark Office and its foreign counterparts use to grant patents are not always applied predictably or uniformly and can change. Additionally, the scope of patents are subject to interpretation by courts and their validity can be subject to challenges and defenses, including challenges and defenses based on the existence of prior art. Consequently, we cannot be certain as to the extent to which we will be able to obtain patents for our new products and technology or the extent to which the patents that we already own or license from others protect our products and technology. Reduction in scope of protection or invalidation of our licensed or owned patents, or our inability to obtain new patents, may enable other companies to develop products that compete with ours on the basis of the same or similar technology.

We also rely on the law of trade secrets to protect unpatented know-how and technology to maintain our competitive position. We try to protect this know-how and technology by limiting access to the trade secrets to those of our employees, contractors and partners with a need to know such information and by entering into confidentiality agreements with parties that have access to it, such as our employees, consultants and business partners. Any of these parties could breach the agreements and disclose our trade secrets or confidential information, or our competitors might learn of the information in some other way. If any trade secret not protected by a patent were to be disclosed to or independently developed by a competitor, our competitive position could be materially harmed.

We could be exposed to significant product liability claims that could be time-consuming and costly, divert management attention and adversely affect our ability to obtain and maintain insurance coverage.

We may be subject to product liability claims if any of our product applications are alleged to be defective or cause harmful effects. For example, because some of our PicoP displays are designed to scan a low power beam of colored light into the user's eye, the testing, manufacture, marketing and sale of these products involve an inherent risk that product liability claims will be asserted against us. Product liability claims or other claims related to our products, regardless of their outcome, could require us to spend significant time and money in litigation, divert management time and attention, require us to pay significant damages, harm our reputation or hinder acceptance of our products. Any successful product liability claim may prevent us from obtaining adequate product liability insurance in the future on commercially desirable or reasonable terms. An inability to obtain sufficient insurance coverage at an acceptable cost or otherwise to protect against potential product liability claims could prevent or inhibit the commercialization of our products.

Our development agreements have long sales cycles, which make it difficult to plan our expenses and forecast our revenues.

Our development agreements have lengthy sales cycles that involve numerous steps including determination of a product application, exploring the technical feasibility of a proposed product, evaluating the costs of manufacturing a product and manufacturing or contracting out the manufacturing of the product. Our long sales cycle, which can last several years, makes it difficult to predict the quarter in which contract signing and revenue recognition will occur. Delays in entering into development agreements could cause significant variability in our revenues and operating results for any particular quarterly period.

Our development contracts may not lead to products that will be profitable.

Our development contracts, including without limitation those discussed in this document, are exploratory in nature and are intended to develop new types of products for new applications. These efforts may prove unsuccessful and these relationships may not result in the development of products that will be profitable.

If we lose our rights under our third-party technology licenses, our operations could be adversely affected.

Our business depends in part on technology rights licensed from third parties. We could lose our exclusivity or other rights to use the technology under our licenses if we fail to comply with the terms and performance requirements of the licenses. In addition, certain licensors may terminate a license upon our breach and have the right to consent to sublicense arrangements. If we were to lose our rights under any of these licenses, or if we were unable to obtain required consents to future sublicenses, we could lose a competitive advantage in the market, and may even lose the ability to commercialize certain products completely. Either of these results could substantially decrease our revenues.

13


Loss of any of our key personnel could have a negative effect on the operation of our business.

Our success depends on our executive officers and other key personnel and on the ability to attract and retain qualified new personnel. Achievement of our business objectives will require substantial additional expertise in the areas of sales and marketing, research and product development and manufacturing. Competition for qualified personnel in these fields is intense, and the inability to attract and retain additional highly skilled personnel, or the loss of key personnel, could reduce our revenues and adversely affect our business.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

We currently lease approximately 67,000 square feet of combined use office, laboratory and manufacturing space at our headquarters facility in Redmond, Washington. The 90 month lease expires in 2013.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are subject to various claims and pending or threatened lawsuits in the normal course of business. We are not currently party to any other legal proceedings that we believe are reasonably possible to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 4A. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Executive officers are appointed by our Board of Directors and hold office until their successors are elected and duly qualified. Mr. Tokman also serves as a director of MicroVision. The following persons serve as executive officers of MicroVision:

Alexander Tokman, age 50, has served as President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of MicroVision since January 2006. Mr. Tokman served as MicroVision's President and Chief Operating Officer from July 2005 to January 2006. Mr. Tokman, a former GE executive, joined MicroVision after a 10-year tenure at GE Healthcare, a subsidiary of General Electric, where he led several global businesses, most recently as General Manager of its Global Molecular Imaging and Radiopharmacy multi-technology business unit from 2003 to 2005. Prior to that, between 1995 and 2003, Mr. Tokman served in various cross-functional and cross-business leadership roles at GE where he led the definition and commercialization of several medical modalities product segments including PET/CT, which added over $500 million of revenue growth to the company within the first three years of its commercial introduction. Mr. Tokman is a certified Six Sigma and Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) Black Belt and Master Black Belt and as one of GE's Six Sigma pioneers, he drove the quality culture change across GE Healthcare in the late 1990s. From November 1989 to March 1995 Mr. Tokman served as new technologies programs lead and a head of I&RD office at Tracor Applied Sciences a subsidiary of then Tracor, Inc. Mr. Tokman has both an M.S. and B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth.

14


Paul Patterson, age 49, joined MicroVision in August 2011 as Vice President of Business Development, Strategic Marketing and Sales. Prior to joining MicroVision, he was Managing Director of Kohritsu USA, an organization globally supporting and managing market adoption of technology innovation for multi-national corporations. He was previously the General Manager for Epson, Japan, responsible for bringing emerging technologies to market. Mr. Patterson also serves as an advisor to several startup companies including Phoenix Venture Partners, TRED Displays, BitAnimate, Jyrate, Electromaterials and Inpria. Mr. Patterson brings to MicroVision considerable experience in emerging technology business development, with a particular emphasis on display technology, semiconductors, biotech, nanotech, optical data communications and RFID. His experience includes management, strategic alliances, business development, research and development, operations and project management. Mr. Patterson is a frequent speaker at global emerging technology and business conferences and author of "Beyond The Beaker: How to Achieve Market Adoption for Emerging Technologies" (2009). He earned his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Oregon State University, completed the Stanford-Singapore University Executive Program in International Business Management and London Stock Exchange Program in Corporate Valuations (Mergers and Acquisitions).

Thomas M. Walker, age 47, joined MicroVision in May 2002 and serves as Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Prior to joining MicroVision, Mr. Walker served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Advanced Radio Telecom Corp., a publicly held technology and services company where he managed domestic and international legal affairs from April 1996 to April 2002. Prior to that, Mr. Walker advised publicly and privately held businesses while practicing in the Los Angeles offices of the law firms of Pillsbury Winthrop and Buchalter, Nemer Fields and Younger. Mr. Walker holds a B.A. from Claremont McKenna College and a J.D. from the University of Oregon.

Jeff T. Wilson, age 51, has served as Chief Financial Officer since April 2006, Principal Financial Officer since January 2006 and Principal Accounting Officer of MicroVision since August 1999. Mr. Wilson served as Vice President, Accounting of MicroVision from April 2002 to April 2006 and as Director of Accounting of MicroVision from August 1999 to March 2002. Prior to joining MicroVision, from 1991 to 1999, Mr. Wilson served in various accounting positions for Siemens Medical Systems, Inc., a developer and manufacturer of medical imaging equipment. Prior to 1991, Mr. Wilson served as a manager with the accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Mr. Wilson is a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. Wilson holds a B.S. in Accounting from Oklahoma State University.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our common stock began trading publicly on August 27, 1996. Our common stock trades on The NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol "MVIS." We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. We currently anticipate that we will retain all future earnings to fund the operations of our business and do not anticipate paying dividends on the common stock in the foreseeable future.

A 1:8 reverse stock split became effective on February 17, 2012. All of the per share prices shown in the table below have been adjusted to reflect the effect of this reverse split.

As of March 1, 2012, there were approximately 344 holders of record of 17,019,000 shares of common stock outstanding.

15


The high and low sales prices of our common stock for each full quarterly period in the last two fiscal years and the year to date as reported by The NASDAQ Global Market, as adjusted for the reverse stock split, are as follows:

      Common Stock
Quarter Ended     HIGH     LOW
2010            
March 31, 2010   $ 29.04   $ 15.36
June 30, 2010     29.52     19.36
September 30, 2010     24.88     16.64
December 31, 2010     18.00     10.24
             
2011            
March 31, 2011   $ 19.36   $ 9.68
June 30, 2011     13.76     8.16
September 30, 2011     11.04     5.28
December 31, 2011     6.80     2.72
             
2012            
January 1, 2012 to March 1, 2012   $ 5.36   $ 2.49

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

A summary of selected financial data as of and for the five years ended December 31, 2011 is set forth below. It should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K. A 1:8 reverse stock split of MicroVision's common stock became effective on February 17, 2012. All of the share and per share amounts discussed and shown in the statements and tables below have been adjusted to reflect the effect of this reverse split.

      YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
      2011     2010     2009     2008     2007
      (in thousands, except per share data)
Statement of Operations Data:                              
Revenue   $ 5,617    $ 4,740    $ 3,833    $ 6,611    $ 10,484 
Net loss available for common shareholders     (35,808)     (47,460)     (39,529)     (32,620)     (19,787)
Basic and diluted net loss per share     (2.57)     (4.17)     (4.29)     (4.23)     (3.17)
Weighted average shares outstanding basic and diluted     13,919      11,379      9,220      7,705      6,245 
Balance Sheet Data:                              
Cash and cash equivalents    $ 13,075    $ 19,413    $ 43,025    $ 25,533    $ 13,399 
Investments available-for-sale         13      2,710      2,705      22,411 
Working capital     5,913      15,618      38,221      24,347      30,043 
Total assets     23,870      35,233      53,536      36,964      45,298 
Long-term liabilities     326      1,394      1,471      1,776      2,201 
Total shareholders' equity (deficit)     10,802      21,833      41,891      27,651      33,061 

16


ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

We are developing high-resolution miniature laser display and imaging engines based upon our proprietary PicoP® display engine technology. Our PicoP technology utilizes our widely patented expertise in two dimensional Micro-Electrical Mechanical Systems (MEMS), lasers, optics and electronics to create a high quality video or still image from a small form factor device with lower power needs than conventional display technologies. Our strategy is to develop and supply PicoP display engines to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) that would embed them into a variety of consumer, automotive, enterprise and industrial products. In markets requiring high volume production of the PicoP display engine components or subsystems that are to be integrated with other components, we plan to provide designs for components, subsystems and systems to OEMs under licensing agreements.

The primary objective for consumer applications is to provide users of mobile consumer devices such as smartphones, media players, tablet PCs and other consumer electronics products with a large screen viewing experience produced by a small embedded projector. These potential products would allow users to watch movies and videos, play video games, and display images and other data onto a variety of surfaces, freeing users from the limitations of a small, palm-sized screen. The PicoP could be further modified to be embedded into a pair of glasses to provide the mobile user with a see-through or occluded personal display to view movies, play games or access other content.

The PicoP with some modification could be embedded into a vehicle or integrated into a portable standalone aftermarket device to create a high-resolution head-up display (HUD) that could project point-by-point navigation, critical operational, safety and other information important to the vehicle operator.

The enterprise products employing our technology would allow users in field-based professions such as service repair or sales to view and share information such as schematics for equipment repair and sales data and orders within CRM applications on a larger, more user-friendly interface. We also see potential for embedding the PicoP laser display engine in industrial products where our displays could be used for 3D measuring and digital signage, enhancing the overall user experience of these applications.

We currently market and sell our SHOWWX™ line of accessory pico projectors, which use our PicoP display engine through a network of global distributors. We continue to enter into a limited number of development agreements with commercial and U.S. government customers to develop advanced prototypes and demonstration units based on our light scanning technologies.

We have incurred substantial losses since inception and expect to incur a substantial loss during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012.

Key Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent liabilities. We evaluate our estimates on an on-going basis. We base our estimates on historical experience, terms of existing contracts, our evaluation of trends in the display and image capture industries, information provided by our current and prospective customers and strategic partners, information available from other outside sources, and on various other assumptions we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. The results form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We believe the following key accounting policies require more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:

Revenue Recognition. Our product sales generally include acceptance provisions. We recognize product revenue upon acceptance of the product by the customer or expiration of the contractual acceptance period, after which there are no rights of return. We have entered into agreements with resellers and distributors, as well as selling directly to the public. Sales made to resellers and distributors are recognized using either the sell-through method or upon expiration of the contractually agreed-upon acceptance period, depending on our ability to reasonably estimate returns. Some of the agreements with resellers and distributors contain price-protection clauses, and revenue is recognized net of these

17


amounts. Sales made directly to the public are recognized either upon expiration of the contractual acceptance period after which there are no rights of return, or net of estimated returns and allowances. Provisions are made for warranties at the time revenue is recorded. Our quarterly revenue may vary substantially due to the timing of product orders from customers, production constraints and availability of components and raw materials.

We recognize contract revenue as work progresses on long-term, cost plus fixed fee, and fixed price contracts using the percentage-of-completion method, which relies on estimates of total expected contract revenue and costs. We have developed processes that allow us to make reasonable estimates of the cost to complete a contract. When we begin work on the contract and at the end of each accounting period, we estimate the labor, material and other costs required to complete the contract using information provided by our technical team, project managers, vendors, outside consultants and others and compare these to costs incurred to date. Since our contracts generally require some level of technology development to complete, the actual cost required to complete a contract can vary from our estimates. Recognized revenues are subject to revisions as actual cost becomes certain. Revisions in revenue estimates are reflected in the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become known. Historically, we have made only immaterial revisions in the estimates to complete the contract at each reporting period. In the future, revisions in these estimates could significantly impact recognized revenue in any one reporting period. If the U.S. government cancels a contract, we would receive payment for work performed and costs committed to prior to the cancellation. We recognize contract revenue on the sale of prototype units and evaluation kits upon acceptance of the deliverables by the customer or expiration of the contractual acceptance period, after which there are no rights of return.

Cost of Revenue. Cost of revenue includes both the direct and allocated indirect costs of performing on development contracts and producing prototype units, evaluation kits, SHOWWX and ROV units. Direct costs include labor, materials and other costs incurred directly in performing on a contract or producing prototype units, evaluation kits, and accessory pico projector products. Indirect costs include labor and other costs associated with operating our research and development department and building our manufacturing and technical capabilities and capacity. Our overhead, which includes the costs of procuring, inspecting and storing material, and facility and depreciation costs, is allocated to inventory, cost of product revenue, cost of contract revenue, and research and development expense based on the proportion of direct material purchased for the respective activity.

Losses on Uncompleted Contracts. We establish an allowance for estimated losses if the estimated cost to complete a contract exceeds the remaining contract value. The entire estimated loss is recorded in the period in which the loss is first determined. We determine the estimated cost to complete a contract through a detailed review of the work to be completed, the resources available to complete the work and the technical difficulty of the remaining work. If the revised estimated cost to complete the contract is higher than the total contract revenue, the entire contract loss is recognized. The actual cost to complete a contract can vary significantly from the estimated cost, due to a variety of factors including availability of technical staff, availability of materials and technical difficulties that arise during a project. Most of our development contracts are cost plus fixed fee type contracts. Under these types of contracts, we are not required to spend more than the contract value to complete the contracted work.

Allowance for uncollectible receivables. We maintain allowances for uncollectible receivables, including accounts receivable, cost and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts and receivables from related parties. We review several factors in determining the allowances including the customer's and related party's past payment history and financial condition. If the financial condition of our customers or the related parties with whom we have receivables were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances could be required.

Intangible Assets. Our intangible assets consist entirely of purchased patents. The patents are amortized using the straight- line method over their estimated period of benefit, ranging from one to 17 years. We evaluate the recoverability of intangible assets periodically by taking into account events or circumstances that may warrant revised estimates of useful lives or that indicate the asset may be impaired.

Inventory. We value inventory at the lower of cost or market with cost determined on a net-realizable value basis. We make significant judgments and estimates to value our inventory and make adjustments to its carrying value. We review several factors in determining the market value of our inventory including evaluating the replacement cost of the raw materials, the net realizable value of the finished goods, and the likelihood of obsolescence. If we do not achieve our targeted sales prices, if market conditions for our components or products were to decline or if we do not achieve our sales forecast, additional reductions in the carrying value of the inventory would be required.

18


Employee Share-Based Compensation. We issue share-based compensation to employees in the form of options exercisable into our common stock and restricted or unrestricted shares of our common stock. We account for equity instruments issued to employees using the straight-line attribution method of allocating the fair value of share-based compensation expense over the requisite service period of the related award. The value of restricted or unrestricted shares is determined using the fair value method, which is based on the number of shares granted and the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market on the date of grant. The value of options is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with estimates of option lives, stock price volatilities and interest rates, then expensed over the periods of service allowing for pre-vest forfeitures. This widely accepted method results in reasonable option values and interperiod expense allocation, and comparability across companies. Changes in the estimated inputs or using other option valuation methods could result in materially different option values and share-based compensation expense.

The key accounting policies described above are not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by generally accepted accounting principles, with no need for us to apply judgment or make estimates. There are also areas in which our judgment in selecting any available alternative would not produce a materially different result to our consolidated financial statements. Additional information about our accounting policies, and other disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles, are set forth in the notes to our consolidated financial statements.

Inflation has not had a material impact on our revenues, or income from continuing operations over the three most recent fiscal years.

Results of Operations

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010

Product Revenue.

            % of           % of            
            product           product            
      2011     revenue     2010     revenue     $ change     % change
(in thousands)                                    
Pico projector revenue   $ 4,098      94.5    $ 3,469      90.1    $ 629      18.1 
Bar code revenue     240      5.5      381      9.9      (141)     (37.0)
Total product revenue   $ 4,338          $ 3,850          $ 488      12.7 

Pico projector revenue includes the sales of our SHOWWX™ line of accessory pico projectors and related accessories, and PicoP engines. Pico projector revenue was higher for the year ended December 31, 2011 than the same period in 2010, as a result of increased sales of our PicoP engines compared to the prior year and a one-time sale of our pico projectors to one customer.

Bar code revenue was lower for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010, due to our decision to stop marketing our bar code product during 2009 and focus on commercializing the PicoP technology. We do not expect to increase our investment in the bar code product in the future.

Our quarterly revenue may vary substantially due to the timing of product orders from customers, production constraints and availability of components and raw materials.

The backlog of product orders at December 31, 2011 was approximately $1.4 million, compared to $12.7 million at December 31, 2010. Product backlog is scheduled for delivery within one year. In September 2011, we received orders of $3.5 million from ESPlus for embedded display engines, the majority of which were scheduled for delivery in the fourth quarter of 2011. During the fourth quarter of 2011, ESPlus determined that it needed additional time to mature the commercial readiness of its media player product and elected to defer PicoP engine shipments into 2012. As a result, we have removed orders of $2.8 million from this customer from our product backlog as of December 31, 2011. We are working with ESPlus to determine a new delivery schedule.

19


Contract Revenue.

            % of           % of            
            contract           contract            
      2011     revenue     2010     revenue     $ change     % change
(in thousands)                                    
Government revenue   $ 345      27.0    $ 201      22.6    $ 144      71.6 
Commercial revenue     934      73.0      689      77.4      245      35.6 
Total contract revenue   $ 1,279          $ 890          $ 389      43.7 

Contract revenue from government and commercial contracts was higher during 2011 than in 2010 due to increased activity on new and existing government and commercial contracts compared to the previous year.

Our backlog of development contracts, including orders for prototype units and evaluation kits, at December 31, 2011 was $622,000 in government contracts and $2,000 in commercial contracts compared to $868,000 in government contracts and $81,000 in commercial contracts at December 31, 2010. We plan to complete the entire contract backlog within one year.

Cost of Product Revenue.

            % of           % of            
            product           product            
      2011     revenue     2010     revenue     $ change     % change
(in thousands)                                    
Cost of product revenue   $ 11,640      268.3    $ 15,779      409.8    $ (4,139)     (26.2)

Our costs to produce accessory pico projector units during 2011 were substantially higher than product revenue. Cost of product revenue includes the direct and allocated indirect cost of manufacturing products sold to customers. Direct costs include labor, materials and other costs incurred directly in the manufacture of these products. Indirect costs include labor and other costs associated with operating our manufacturing capabilities and capacity. In the event that we maintain production capacity in excess of production requirements, cost of product revenue may also include manufacturing overhead associated with the excess capacity.

Cost of product revenue for 2011 and 2010 included write downs of $1.6 million and $9.6 million, respectively, for inventory in stock at the end of the year. The write downs were primarily for lower of cost or market adjustments to our inventory value to reflect the then current estimated selling price for our inventory, as well as a reserve adjustment for materials which we expect would become obsolete as we introduced new products. The decrease in cost of product revenue for 2011, compared to 2010, was primarily attributed to decreased inventory write downs compared to the prior year. During 2011, we sold inventory which had been previously written down to the lower of cost or market. Accordingly, cost of product revenue for 2011 did not include approximately $1.7 million of previously recognized write downs associated with this inventory. During 2011, we recognized approximately $850,000 of warranty expense primarily associated with our PicoP display engine. Warranty expense in 2010 was not material.

During 2011, we expensed approximately $1.3 million of manufacturing overhead associated with production capacity in excess of production requirements. We did not expense any overhead associated with excess capacity during 2010. We classified overhead cost allocated to the accessory pico projector as research and development expense until February 2010, when we determined that the product's design and production processes were mature enough to support commercial production and we began classifying overhead cost as cost of product revenue.

The cost of product revenue as a percentage of product revenue can fluctuate significantly from period to period, depending on the product mix, the level of overhead expense and the volume of direct materials purchased. The decrease in the cost of product revenue as a percentage of product revenue in 2011 compared to the same period in 2010 was due to decreased inventory write downs for the SHOWWX family of products.

20


Cost of Contract Revenue.

            % of           % of            
            contract           contract            
      2011     revenue     2010     revenue     $ change     % change
(in thousands)                                    
Cost of contract revenue   $ 1,425      111.4    $ 443      49.8    $ 982      221.7 

The cost of contract revenue was higher in 2011 than in 2010 as a result of the increased activity on development contracts and recognized losses on two contracts on which we performed work during 2011. The losses were primarily as a result of our decision to share costs with one customer for development of advanced in-vehicle HUD prototypes in anticipation of follow-on revenue opportunities and excess material costs associated with minimum order quantities for materials required to complete one of our development contracts. Gross margin on contract revenue was significantly lower in 2011 compared to 2010, as a result of these recognized losses. The combined impact of the losses on contracts and lower gross margin was approximately $710,000.

The cost of contract revenue as a percentage of revenue was higher in 2011 than in 2010 as a result of the recognized losses and higher labor expense resulting from a change in the labor resources allocated to the contracts. The cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue can fluctuate significantly from period to period, depending on the contract cost mix and the levels of direct and indirect costs incurred.

Research and Development Expense.

      2011     2010     $ change     % change
(in thousands)                        
Research and development   $ 15,279    $ 21,600    $ (6,321)     (29.3)

Research and development expense consists of compensation-related costs of employees and contractors engaged in internal research and product development activities, direct material to support development programs, laboratory operations, outsourced development and processing work, and other operating expenses. We allocate our research and development resources based on the business opportunity of the available projects, the skill mix of the resources available and the contractual commitments we have made to customers.

The decrease in research and development expense during 2011, compared to the same period in 2010, is primarily attributable to decreased subcontractor costs associated with advanced research and decreased payroll costs due to reductions in staffing levels, compared to the prior year.

In 2011, we aggressively managed our operating expenses as part of our strategy to simplify operations and significantly reduce our 2011 cash requirements as we focused our efforts on development of the next-generation of our PicoP technology based on direct green lasers. As a result, our research and development expense significantly decreased for 2011 compared to 2010.

We believe that a substantial level of continuing research and development expense will be required to develop additional commercial products using the PicoP technology. Accordingly, we anticipate our level of research and development spending will continue to be substantial.

Sales, Marketing, General and Administrative Expense.

      2011     2010     $ change     % change
(in thousands)                        
Sales, marketing, general and administrative   $ 13,314    $ 15,252    $ (1,938)     (12.7)

Sales, marketing, general and administrative expense includes compensation and support costs for marketing, sales, management and administrative staff, and for other general and administrative costs, including legal and accounting services, consultants and other operating expenses. The decrease in cost during 2011 compared to the same period in 2010 is primarily due to decreased payroll costs due to reductions in staffing levels.

21


In 2011, we aggressively managed our operating expenses as part of our strategy to simplify operations and significantly reduce our 2011 cash requirements as we focused our efforts on development of the next-generation of our PicoP technology based on direct green lasers. As a result, our sales, marketing, general and administrative expense decreased for 2011 compared to 2010.

Interest Income and Expense.

      2011     2010     $ change     % change
(in thousands)                        
Interest income   $ 47    $ 112    $ (65)     (58.0)
      2011     2010     $ change     % change
(in thousands)                        
Interest expense   $ 46    $ 62    $ (16)     (25.8)

The decrease in interest income in 2011 from 2010 results primarily from lower average cash, investment securities balances, and interest rates. The decrease in interest expense in 2011 from 2010 results primarily from lower average balances on our capital leases and our outstanding loan for leasehold improvements.

Realized Loss on Sale of Investment Securities

At December 31, 2009, we held $3.0 million par value student loan auction-rate securities (SLARS), fair valued at $2.7 million. In March and December 2010, one of the issuers redeemed a total of $200,000 of our SLARS at par value through a voluntary lottery redemption program. In December 2010, we sold our remaining SLARS for proceeds of approximately $2.4 million and recorded a loss of $127,000 which is included in "Realized loss on sale of investment securities" on the consolidated statement of operations.

Gain on Derivative Instruments, Net.

      2011     2010     $ change     % change
(in thousands)                        
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net   $   $ 842    $ (842)     (100.0)

Prior to 2011, we had common stock warrants outstanding that were issued in connection with certain notes. The warrants met the definition of derivative instruments that must be accounted for as liabilities because we could not engage in certain corporate transactions affecting the common stock unless we made a cash payment to the holders of the warrants. We recorded changes in the fair values of the warrants in the statement of operations each period. In July 2008, warrants to purchase 750,000 shares of common stock expired unexercised. During 2010, the remaining 1,552,000 expired unexercised. The change in value of the warrants of $840,000 in 2010 was recorded as a non-operating gain and is included in "Gain on derivative instruments, net" in the consolidated statement of operations.

Income Taxes.

No provision for income taxes has been recorded because we have experienced net losses from inception through December 31, 2011. At December 31, 2011, we had net operating loss carry-forwards of approximately $283.2 million for federal income tax reporting purposes. In addition, we have research and development tax credits of $5.8 million. The net operating loss carry-forwards and research and development credits available to offset future taxable income, if any, will expire in varying amounts from 2017 to 2031 if not previously utilized. In 2011, $2.1 million in net operating loss carry-forwards expired. The research and development tax credits and the remaining net operating losses are scheduled to expire between 2017 and 2031. In certain circumstances, as specified in the Internal Revenue Code, a 50% or more ownership change by certain combinations of our shareholders during any three-year period would result in a limitation on our ability to utilize a portion of our net operating loss carry-forwards. We have determined that such a change of ownership occurred during 1996 and that the annual utilization of loss carry-forwards generated through the period of that change will be limited to approximately $1.6 million.

We recognize interest accrued and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense. We did not have any unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2011 or at December 31, 2010.

22


YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009

Product Revenue.

            % of           % of            
            product           product            
      2010     revenue     2009     revenue     $ change     % change
(in thousands)                                    
Pico projector revenue   $ 3,469      90.1    $ 330      32.5    $ 3,139      951.2 
Bar code revenue     381      9.9      686      67.5      (305)     (44.5)
Total product revenue   $ 3,850          $ 1,016          $ 2,834      278.9 

Pico projector revenue includes the sales of SHOWWX which was launched in September 2009 and the SHOWWX+ which was launched in November 2010.

Bar code revenue includes the sales of ROV bar code scanners. The decrease in bar code revenue for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 was due to our decreased investment in our bar code product during 2009.

The backlog of product orders at December 31, 2010 was approximately $12.7 million, compared to $3.8 million at December 31, 2009.

Contract Revenue.

            % of           % of            
            contract           contract            
      2010     revenue     2009     revenue     $ change     % change
(in thousands)                                    
Government revenue   $ 201      22.6    $ 1,649      58.5    $ (1,448)     (87.8)
Commercial revenue     689      77.4      1,168      41.5      (479)     (41.0)
Total contract revenue   $ 890          $ 2,817          $ (1,927)     (68.4)

We earn contract revenue from performance on development contracts with the U.S. government and commercial customers and from the sale of prototype units and evaluation kits based on our PicoP display engine. Our contract revenue in a particular period is dependent upon when we enter into a contract, the value of the contracts we have entered into, and the availability of technical resources to perform work on the contracts.

Contract revenue from government and commercial contracts was substantially lower during 2010 than in 2009 due to reduced contract activity and lower beginning backlog in 2010 compared to the previous year.

Our backlog of development contracts, including orders for prototype units and evaluation kits, at December 31, 2010 was $868,000 in government contracts and $81,000 in commercial contracts compared to $70,000 in government contracts and $30,000 in commercial contracts at December 31, 2009. The increase in backlog from 2009 is primarily attributed to two contracts with the US government entered into in late 2010.

23


Cost of Product Revenue.

            % of           % of            
            product           product            
      2010     revenue     2009     revenue     $ change     % change
(in thousands)                                    
Cost of product revenue   $ 15,779      409.8    $ 2,363      232.6    $ 13,416      567.8 

Our costs to produce accessory pico projector units during 2010 were substantially higher than product revenue. During the early phase of SHOWWX production, our design and manufacturing processes were not sufficiently mature to support commercial production. We classified overhead cost allocated to the SHOWWX as research and development expense until February 2010, when we determined that the SHOWWX design and production processes were mature enough to reach a level to support commercial production and since February 2010, all manufacturing costs have been included in cost of revenue.

Cost of product revenue for 2010 and 2009, included a write down of $9.6 million and $1.3 million, respectively, for inventory in stock at the end of the year. The write downs included lower of cost or market adjustments primarily comprised of adjustments to our inventory value to reflect the then current estimated selling price for our inventory, as well as a reserve adjustment for materials which we expect would become obsolete as we introduced new products. The increase in cost of product revenue for 2010, compared to 2009, was primarily attributed to increased material costs associated with higher volumes of product shipments and increased inventory write downs compared to the prior year.

The increase in the cost of product revenue as a percentage of product revenue in 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 was due to an increase in inventory write downs and a higher cost structure for the SHOWWX product.

Cost of Contract Revenue.

            % of           % of            
            contract           contract            
      2010     revenue     2009     revenue     $ change     % change
(in thousands)                                    
Cost of contract revenue   $ 443      49.8    $ 1,531      54.3    $ (1,088)     (71.1)

The cost of contract revenue was lower in 2010 than in 2009 as a result of the decreased activity on development contracts as we continue to focus our resources on commercialization of products based on the PicoP display engine.

The cost of contract revenue as a percentage of revenue was lower in 2010 than in 2009 as a result of difference in the cost mix of the contracts during those periods.

Research and Development Expense.

      2010     2009     $ change     % change
(in thousands)                        
Research and development   $ 21,600    $ 24,577    $ (2,977)     (12.1)

The decrease in cost during 2010, compared to the same period in 2009, is primarily attributable to less direct material purchased for development programs and a decrease in overhead allocated to research and development.

Sales, Marketing, General and Administrative Expense.

      2010     2009     $ change     % change
(in thousands)                        
Sales, marketing, general and administrative   $ 15,252    $ 14,540    $ 712      4.9 

24


The increase in cost during 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 is primarily due to increased sales and marketing expense related to promoting our accessory pico projector products.

Interest Income and Expense.

      2010     2009     $ change     % change
(in thousands)                        
Interest income   $ 112    $ 212    $ (100)     (47.2)
      2010     2009     $ change     % change
(in thousands)                        
Interest expense   $ 62    $ 68    $ (6)     (8.8)

The decrease in interest income in 2010 from 2009 results primarily from lower average cash, investments securities balances, and interest rates.

Realized Loss on Sale of Investment Securities

At December 31, 2009, we held $3.0 million par value student loan auction-rate securities (SLARS), fair valued at $2.7 million. In March and December 2010, one of the issuers redeemed a total of $200,000 of our SLARS at par value through a voluntary lottery redemption program. In December 2010, we sold our remaining SLARS for proceeds of approximately $2.4 million and recorded a loss of $127,000 which is included in "Realized loss on sale of investment securities" on the consolidated statement of operations.

Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments, Net.

      2010     2009     $ change     % change
(in thousands)                        
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net   $ 842    $ (506)   $ 1,348      (266.4)

The change in "Gain (Loss) on derivative instruments, net" is primarily driven by the change in value of warrants we issued in 2005 to purchase 2,302,000 shares of common stock in connection with certain notes. The warrants met the definition of derivative instruments that must be accounted for as liabilities because we could not engage in certain corporate transactions affecting the common stock unless we made a cash payment to the holders of the warrants. We recorded changes in the fair values of the warrants in the statement of operations each period. As of December 31, 2009, 1,552,000 warrants remained outstanding and subsequently expired unexercised by December 31, 2010. The change in value of the warrants of $840,000 in 2010 was recorded as a non-operating gain and is included in "Gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net" in the consolidated statement of operations.

Income Taxes.

No provision for income taxes has been recorded because we have experienced net losses from inception through December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2010, we had net operating loss carry-forwards of approximately $257.6 million for federal income tax reporting purposes. In addition, we had research and development tax credits of $5.4 million. We recognize interest accrued and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense. We did not have any unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2010 or at December 31, 2009.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have incurred significant losses since inception. We have funded operations to date primarily through the sale of common stock, convertible preferred stock, warrants, the issuance of convertible debt and, to a lesser extent, from development contract revenues and product sales. At December 31, 2011, we had $13.1 million in cash, cash equivalents, and investment securities, available-for-sale.

During 2011, we lowered our cash used in operations significantly, through a combination of:

  • sharing development and commercialization costs of the next-generation PicoP technology based on direct green lasers with our development partners;
  • limiting our investment into advancement of the current-generation PicoP technology based on synthetic green lasers;
  • moving product development to original design manufacturers
  • lowering our working capital requirements through a restructuring of inventory cycles with major suppliers;

25


  • reducing our operating costs through a 20% workforce reduction completed in January 2011, in addition to other measures.

Based on our current operating plan, we anticipate that we have sufficient cash and cash equivalents to fund our operations through June 2012. We will require additional cash to fund our operating plan past that time. We are introducing new products into an emerging market which creates significant uncertainty about our ability to accurately project revenue, costs and cash flows. If the level of sales anticipated by our financial plan is not achieved or our working capital requirements are higher than planned, we will need to raise additional cash sooner or take actions to reduce operating expenses. We plan to obtain additional cash through the issuance of equity or debt securities. There can be no assurance that additional cash will be available or that, if available, it will be available on terms acceptable to us on a timely basis. If adequate funds are not available on a timely basis we may be required to limit our operations substantially. This limitation of operations could include reducing our planned investment in working capital to fund revenue growth and delaying development projects resulting in reductions in staff, operating costs, capital expenditures and investment in research and development.

We have received a report from our independent registered public accounting firm regarding the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 that includes an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements are prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern.

Cash used in operating activities totaled $27.9 million during 2011, compared to $46.2 million during 2010. During 2011, the decrease in net cash used in operating activities was primarily driven by lower inventory purchases for commercialization of PicoP-based products as well as savings resulting from steps taken to lower our 2011 cash use as described above.

Investing Activities

Cash provided by investing activities totaled $170,000 in 2011 compared to $381,000 in 2010. In 2011, the decrease in cash provided by investing activities primarily resulted from lower cash inflows generated from sales of investment securities compared to 2010, offset by fewer cash outflows associated with implementation of a new enterprise resource planning system and production equipment purchases compared to one year ago.

Financing Activities

Cash provided by financing activities totaled $21.4 million in 2011, compared to $22.2 million in 2010. The following is a list of our financing activities during 2011, 2010, and 2009. All share amounts have been adjusted for the 1:8 reverse stock split discussed in this annual report.

  • In November 2011, we raised approximately $10.5 million, before issuance costs of approximately $925,000, through an underwritten public offering of 2.2 million shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 1.3 million shares of our common stock.
  • During 2011, we also raised an aggregate of $12.1 million, before issuance costs of approximately $635,000, from the sale of 1.7 million shares of our common stock under our committed equity financing facilities with Azimuth. We terminated one of these facilities in July 2011 and the other two in November 2011.
  • In 2010, we raised an aggregate of $22.4 million, before issuance costs of approximately $768,000, from the sale of 1.6 million shares of our common stock under our committed equity financing facility with Azimuth.
  • In November and December 2009, we raised an aggregate of $33.1 million, before issuance costs of approximately $2.3 million, from the sale of 1.4 million shares of our common stock through underwritten public offerings.
  • During 2009, we raised $3.9 million from the exercise of warrants to purchase 142,000 shares of common stock and $1.3 million from the exercise of 42,000 stock options.
  • In June 2009, we raised approximately $15.0 million, before issuance costs of approximately $218,000, from the sale of 1.0 million shares of common stock and warrants to purchase approximately 252,000 shares of our common stock to a strategic investor. The warrants have an exercise price of $17.48 per share, a three year term, and are exercisable on the date of issuance. We can call the warrants if the average closing bid price of our stock is over $69.92 for any 20 consecutive trading days.

26


Our cash requirements will depend on many factors, including, but not limited to, the rate at which we can, directly or through arrangements with OEMs, introduce products incorporating our technology and the market acceptance and competitive position of such products.

Future operating expenditures and capital requirements will depend on numerous factors, including the following:

  • the progress of research and development programs,
  • the progress in commercialization activities and arrangements,
  • the cost of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent claims and other intellectual property rights,
  • competing technological and market developments, and
  • our ability to establish cooperative development, joint venture and licensing arrangements.

In order to maintain our exclusive rights under our license agreement with the University of Washington, we are obligated to make royalty payments to the University of Washington with respect to the Virtual Retinal Display technology. If we are successful in establishing original equipment manufacturer co-development and joint venture arrangements, we expect our partners to fund certain non-recurring engineering costs for technology development and/or for product development. Nevertheless, we expect our cash requirements to remain high as we expand our activities and operations with the objective of commercializing our light scanning technology.

The following table lists our contractual obligations (in thousands):

      Payments Due By Period
      Less than                 More than      
      1 year     1-3 years     3-5 years     5 years     Total
Contractual Obligations:                              
Open purchase obligations *   $ 5,254    $   $   $   $ 5,254 
Minimum payments under capital leases     62      83              145 
Minimum payments under operating leases     938      564              1,502 
Minimum payments under long-term debt     103      69              172 
Minimum payments under research, royalty                              
     and licensing agreements     1,253      2,511      2,436      10,722      16,922 
          Total   $ 7,610    $ 3,227    $ 2,436    $ 10,722    $ 23,995 

* Open purchase obligations represent commitments to purchase inventory, materials, capital equipment, maintenance agreements and other goods used in the normal operation of our business.

+License and royalty obligations continue through the lives of the underlying patents, which is currently through at least 2024.

New accounting pronouncements

In May 2011, the FASB issued a new accounting standard on fair value measurements that clarifies the application of existing guidance and disclosure requirements, changes certain fair value measurement principles and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued a new accounting standard on the presentation of comprehensive income. The new standard requires the presentation of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The new standard also requires presentation of adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statement where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. The standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within these years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

27


ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Interest Rate and Market Liquidity Risks

As of the end of 2011, all of our total cash, cash equivalents and investment securities available-for-sale have variable interest rates or are equity investments traded in active markets. Therefore, we believe our exposure to market and interest rate risks is not material.

Our investment policy generally directs that the investment managers should select investments to achieve the following goals: principal preservation, adequate liquidity and return. As of December 31, 2011, our cash and cash equivalents and investments available-for-sale securities portfolio are comprised of short-term highly rated money market savings accounts and equity investments.

The values of cash equivalents and investment securities, available-for-sale by maturity date as of December 31, 2011, are as follows:

      Amount     Percent  
Cash and cash equivalents   $ 13,075,000      99.9  %
Less than one year     8,000      0.1   
    $ 13,083,000      100.0  %

Foreign Exchange Rate Risk

All of our development contract payments are made in U.S. dollars. However, in the future we may enter into development contracts in foreign currencies that may subject us to foreign exchange rate risk. We have purchase orders and supply agreements in foreign currencies and may enter into such agreements from time to time in the future.  We also make payments related to our MicroVision Singapore operations in Singapore dollars. We believe our exposure to currency fluctuations related to these arrangements is not material. We intend to enter into foreign currency hedges to offset material exposure to currency fluctuations when we can adequately determine the timing and amounts of the exposure.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

29

   

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010

30

   

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

31

   

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

32

   

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

33

   

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

34

   

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

35

   

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves Schedule

53

28


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of MicroVision, Inc.:

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, comprehensive loss and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MicroVision, Inc. (the "Company") at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Seattle, Washington
March 8, 2012

29


MicroVision, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets (in thousands, except per share information)

      December 31,
      2011     2010
Assets            
Current assets            
     Cash and cash equivalents   $ 13,075    $ 19,413 
     Investment securities, available-for-sale         13 
     Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $243 and $588     463      1,116 
     Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts     70      137 
     Inventory     4,254      6,075 
     Current restricted investments         306 
     Other current assets     785      564 
          Total current assets     18,655      27,624 
             
Property and equipment, net     2,347      4,169 
Restricted investments     786      1,189 
Intangible assets     2,048      2,233 
Other assets     34      18 
               Total assets   $ 23,870    $ 35,233 
             
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity            
Current liabilities            
     Accounts payable   $ 7,341    $ 7,665 
     Accrued liabilities     5,113      4,135 
     Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts     156      81 
     Current portion of capital lease obligations     39      40 
     Current portion of long-term debt     93      85 
          Total current liabilities     12,742      12,006 
             
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion     72      114 
Long-term debt, net of current portion     67      159 
Deferred rent, net of current portion     187      697 
Other long-term liabilities         424 
             
          Total liabilities     13,068      13,400 
             
Commitments and contingencies             
             
Shareholders' Equity            
     Preferred stock, par value $.001; 25,000 shares authorized; 0 and            
          0 shares issued and outstanding        
     Common stock, par value $.001; 100,000 shares authorized; 17,019 and            
          12,809 shares issued and outstanding     17      13 
     Additonal paid-in capital     425,658      400,880 
     Accumulated other comprehensive loss     (35)     (30)
     Accumulated deficit     (414,838)     (379,030)
          Total shareholders' equity     10,802      21,833 
               Total liabilities and shareholders' equity   $ 23,870    $ 35,233 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

30


MicroVision, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands, except per share information)

      Years Ended December 31,
      2011     2010     2009
Product revenue   $ 4,338    $ 3,850    $ 1,016 
Contract revenue     1,279      890      2,817 
Total revenue     5,617      4,740      3,833 
                   
Cost of product revenue     11,640      15,779      2,363 
Cost of contract revenue     1,425      443      1,531 
Total cost of revenue     13,065      16,222      3,894 
     Gross margin     (7,448)     (11,482)     (61)
                   
Research and development expense     15,279      21,600      24,577 
Sales, marketing, general and administrative expense     13,314      15,252      14,540 
Gain on disposal of fixed assets     (11)        
Total operating expenses     28,582      36,852      39,117 
Loss from operations     (36,030)     (48,334)     (39,178)
                   
Interest income     47      112      212 
Interest expense     (46)     (62)     (68)
Realized loss on sale of investment securities         (127)    
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net         842      (506)
Other income     221      109      11 
Net loss   $ (35,808)   $ (47,460)   $ (39,529)
                   
Net loss per share basic and diluted   $ (2.57)   $ (4.17)   $ (4.29)
                   
Weighted-average shares outstanding basic and diluted     13,919      11,379      9,220 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of consolidated financial statements.

31


MicroVision, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss (in thousands)

      Years Ended December 31,
      2011     2010     2009
Net loss   $ (35,808)   $ (47,460)   $ (39,529)
                   
Other comprehensive gain (loss)                  
     Unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities, available-for-sale:                  
          Unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during period     (5)        
Comprehensive loss   $ (35,813)   $ (47,457)   $ (39,524)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

32


MicroVision, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity (in thousands)

    Shareholders' Equity (Deficit)
                      Accumulated            
    Common Stock     Additional     other           Total
          Par     paid-in     comprehensive     Accumulated     Shareholders'
    Shares     value     capital     loss     deficit     equity
Balance at December 31, 2008   8,510    $   $ 319,721    $ (38)   $ (292,041)   $ 27,651 
Share-based compensation expense           3,335              3,335 
Exercise of warrants and options   184          4,794              4,794 
Sales of common stock and warrants   2,389          45,633              45,635 
Other comprehensive income                      
Net loss                   (39,529)     (39,529)
Balance at December 31, 2009   11,086      11      373,483      (33)     (331,570)     41,891 
Share-based compensation expense   11          3,601              3,601 
Exercise of warrants and options   30          478              478 
Sales of common stock and warrants   1,578          21,618              21,620 
Issuance of common stock for payment                                  
     of intellectual property   104          1,700              1,700 
Other comprehensive income                      
Net loss                   (47,460)     (47,460)
Balance at December 31, 2010   12,809      13      400,880      (30)     (379,030)     21,833 
Share-based compensation expense   218          3,356              3,356 
Exercise of warrants and options           70              70 
Sales of common stock and warrants   3,987          21,352              21,356 
Other comprehensive loss               (5)         (5)
Net loss                   (35,808)     (35,808)
Balance at December 31, 2011   17,019    $ 17    $ 425,658    $ (35)   $ (414,838)   $ 10,802 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

33


MicroVision, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands)

      Years Ended December 31,
      2011     2010     2009
Cash flows from operating activities                  
     Net loss   $ (35,808)   $ (47,460)   $ (39,529)
     Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations:                  
          Depreciation     2,406      1,731      1,138 
          Amortization of intangible assets     185      32     
          Gain on disposal of property and equipment     (11)        
          Realized loss on sale of short-term investments         127     
          Non-cash stock-based compensation     3,356      3,450      3,373 
          Loss (gain) on derivative instruments         (842)     506 
          Inventory write-downs     1,563      9,579      1,257 
          Non-cash deferred rent     (340)     (276)     (276)
     Change in:                  
          Accounts receivable     653      (203)     (376)
          Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts     67      (67)     625 
          Inventory     258      (14,728)     (658)
          Other current assets     (221)     187      115 
          Other assets     (16)     15      (3)
          Accounts payable     (532)     2,591      1,477 
          Accrued liabilities     808      (358)     646 
          Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts     75      26      (7)
          Other long-term liabilities     (330)        
               Net cash used in operating activities     (27,887)     (46,196)     (31,710)
                   
Cash flows from investing activities                  
     Sales of investment securities         2,573     
     Purchases of restricted investment securities         (305)    
     (Increase)/Decrease in restricted investment     709      (1)     143 
     Proceeds on sale of property and equipment     11         
     Purchases of property and equipment and intangible assets     (550)     (1,886)     (1,360)
               Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities     170      381      (1,217)
                   
Cash flows from financing activities                  
     Principal payments under capital leases     (43)     (65)     (60)
     Principal payments under long-term debt     (84)     (78)     (71)
     Net proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants     21,506      22,346      50,550 
               Net cash provided by financing activities     21,379      22,203      50,419 
                   
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents     (6,338)     (23,612)     17,492 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period     19,413      43,025      25,533 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period   $ 13,075    $ 19,413    $ 43,025 
                   
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information                  
     Cash paid for interest   $ 46    $ 62    $ 68 
                   
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities                  
     Property and equipment acquired under capital leases   $   $   $ 95 
                   
     Other non-cash additions to property and equipment   $ 229    $ 101    $ 85 
                   
     Issuance of common stock for payment of intellectual property   $   $ 1,700    $

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

34


MicroVision, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1. The Company

MicroVision, Inc. (the "Company") is developing high-resolution miniature laser display and imaging engines based upon our proprietary PicoP® display engine technology. Our PicoP technology utilizes our widely patented expertise in two dimensional Micro-Electrical Mechanical Systems (MEMS), lasers, optics and electronics to create a high quality video or still image from a small form factor device with lower power needs than conventional display technologies. Our strategy is to develop and supply PicoP display engines to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) that would embed them into a variety of consumer, automotive, enterprise and industrial products.

The primary objective for consumer applications is to provide users of mobile consumer devices such as smartphones, media players, tablet PCs and other consumer electronic products with a large screen viewing experience produced by a small embedded projector. These potential products would allow users to watch movies and videos, play video games, and display images, and other data onto a variety of surfaces, freeing users from the limitations of a small, palm-sized screen. The PicoP could be further modified to be embedded into a pair of glasses to provide the mobile user with a see-through or occluded personal display to view movies, play games or access other content.

The PicoP with some modification could be embedded into a vehicle or integrated into a portable standalone aftermarket device to create a high-resolution head-up display (HUD) that could project point-by-point navigation, critical operational, safety and other information important to the vehicle operator.

The enterprise products employing our technology would allow users in field-based professions such as service repair or sales to view and share information such as schematics for equipment repair and sales data and orders within CRM applications on a larger, more user-friendly interface. We also see potential for embedding the PicoP laser display engine in industrial products where our displays could be used for 3D measuring and digital signage, enhancing the overall user experience of these applications.

We currently market and sell our SHOWWX™ line of accessory pico projectors that use our PicoP display engine through a network of global distributors. We continue to enter into a limited number of development agreements with commercial and U.S. government customers to develop advanced prototypes and demonstration units based on our light scanning technologies.

Based on our current operating plan, we anticipate that we have sufficient cash and cash equivalents to fund our operations through June 2012. We will require additional cash to fund our operating plan past that time. We are introducing new products into an emerging market which creates significant uncertainty about our ability to accurately project revenue, costs and cash flows. If the level of sales anticipated by our financial plan is not achieved or our working capital requirements are higher than planned, we will need to raise additional cash sooner or take actions to reduce operating expenses.

We plan to obtain additional cash through the issuance of equity or debt securities. There can be no assurance that additional cash will be available or that, if available, it will be available on terms acceptable to us on a timely basis. If adequate funds are not available on a timely basis, we intend to consider limiting our operations substantially to extend our funds as we pursue other financing opportunities and business relationships. This limitation of operations could include reducing our planned investment in working capital to fund revenue growth and delaying development projects resulting in reductions in staff, operating costs, capital expenditures and investment in research and development.

35


Our capital requirements will depend on many factors, including, but not limited to, the rate at which we can, directly or through arrangements with OEMs, introduce products incorporating the PicoP display engine and image capture technologies and the market acceptance and competitive position of such products. If revenues are less than anticipated, if the mix of revenues vary from anticipated amounts or if expenses exceed the amounts budgeted, we may require additional capital earlier than expected to further the development of our technologies, for expenses associated with product development, and to respond to competitive pressures or to meet unanticipated development difficulties. In addition, our operating plan provides for the development of strategic relationships with systems and equipment manufacturers that may require additional investments by us.

We have received a report from our independent registered public accounting firm regarding the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 that includes an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. These consolidated financial statements are prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern.

A 1:8 reverse stock split of MicroVision's common stock became effective on February 17, 2012. All of the share and per share amounts discussed and shown in the consolidated financial statements and notes have been adjusted to reflect the effect of this reverse split.

2. Summary of significant accounting policies

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. We have identified the following areas where significant estimates and assumptions have been made in preparing the financial statements: revenue recognition, valuation of share-based compensation, allowance for uncollectible receivables, inventory valuation and valuation of derivative financial instruments.

Principles of consolidation

Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of MicroVision, Inc. and MicroVision Innovations Singapore Pte. Ltd. ("MicroVision Singapore"), a wholly owned foreign subsidiary. MicroVision Singapore was incorporated in April 2011 and is engaged in advanced research and development activities and operation support functions for MicroVision, Inc. There were no material intercompany accounts and transactions during the year ended December 31, 2011.

Cash and cash equivalents; investment securities, available-for-sale; and fair value of financial instruments

Our financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, investments available-for-sale, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and long-term debt. Excluding the long term debt, the carrying value of our financial instruments approximates fair value due to their short maturities. The carrying amount of long-term debt at December 31, 2011 and 2010 was not materially different from the fair value based on rates available for similar types of arrangements.

The fair value of financial instruments is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, the authoritative guidance establishes a three level fair value inputs hierarchy, with Level 1 being observable inputs such as quoted market prices in active markets, Level 2 being observable inputs that are not sufficiently active to qualify as Level 1, and Level 3 being inputs that are unobservable by market participants outside of the Company and must be estimated using assumptions we develop. We use market data, assumptions and risks we believe market participants would use in measuring the fair value of the asset or liability, including the risks inherent in the inputs and the valuation techniques. We disclose the lowest level input significant to each category of asset or liability. We use inputs which are as observable as possible and the methods most applicable to the specific situation of each company or valued item.

36


We consider fair valued assets impaired when the fair value is less than cost. When the impairment is significant, we judge whether the impairment is temporary or other-than-temporary. An impairment is generally considered to be other-than-temporary and recorded as such in the period when there is deemed sufficient reason to conclude that the fair value of the asset is not expected to recover to the recorded fair value prior to the expected time of sale or maturity. We classify other-than-temporary fair value impairments into one of two categories: "credit" or "other factors". Other-than-temporary impairments are charged to current earnings if they are of the "credit" type or recorded to other comprehensive loss if they are due to "other factors".

Our cash equivalents and investment securities available-for-sale are comprised of money market savings accounts and equity securities. We classify investment securities available-for-sale purchased with 90 days or less remaining until contractual maturities as cash equivalents. Investment securities purchased with more than 90 days until contractual maturities are classified as current investment securities available-for-sale on the consolidated balance sheet with unrealized gains and losses included in the consolidated statement of comprehensive loss. Interest income, realized gains and losses, and other-than-temporary credit type impairments are recognized in the period earned or incurred and presented separately in the consolidated statement of operations. Changes in the fair values of derivatives are realized in the period of remeasurement and recorded in Gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net in the consolidated statement of operations. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method.

Intangible assets

Our intangible assets consist entirely of purchased patents. The patents are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated period of benefit, ranging from one to 17 years. We evaluate the recoverability of intangible assets periodically by taking into account events or circumstances that may warrant revised estimates of useful lives or that indicate the asset may be impaired.

Inventory

Inventory consists of raw material and finished goods for our pico projectors and ROV products. Inventory is recorded at the lower of cost or market with cost determined on a net realizable value basis. We periodically assess the need to provide for obsolescence of inventory and adjust the carrying value of inventory to its net realizable value when required. In addition, we reduce the value of our inventory to its estimated scrap value when we determine that it is not probable that the inventory will be consumed through normal production during the next twelve months.

Property and equipment

Property and equipment is stated at cost and depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the assets (two to five years) using the straight-line method. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of estimated useful lives or the lease term. Costs for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred and expenditures for major improvements are capitalized at cost. Gains or losses on the disposition of assets are reflected in the income statements at the time of disposal.

Restricted investments

As of December 31, 2011, restricted investments were in money market savings accounts and serve as collateral for $786,000 in irrevocable letters of credit. The restricted investments balance includes two letters of credit totaling $436,000 which are outstanding in connection with a lease agreement for our corporate headquarters building in Redmond, WA. The required balance decreases over the term of the lease, which expires in 2013. Also included in the restricted investments balance was a $350,000 letter of credit which was outstanding under the terms of a supplier agreement, and expired in January 2012.

Revenue recognition

Product revenue is recognized when there is sufficient evidence of an arrangement, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. We have entered into agreements with resellers and distributors, as well as selling directly to the public. Sales made to resellers and distributors are recognized using either the sell-through method or upon expiration of the contractually agreed-upon acceptance period, depending on the volume of the sale. Some of the agreements with resellers and distributors contain price-protection clauses, and revenue is recognized net of these amounts. Sales made directly to the public are recognized either upon expiration of the contractual acceptance period after which there are no rights of return, or net of estimated returns and allowances. Provisions are made for warranties at the time revenue is recorded.

37


Contract revenue has primarily been generated from contracts to develop the light scanning technology and to produce demonstration units for commercial enterprises and the U.S. government. We recognize contract revenue as work progresses on long-term cost plus fixed fee and fixed price contracts using the percentage-of-completion method, which relies on estimates of total expected contract revenue and costs. Our revenue contracts generally include a statement of the work we are to complete and the total fee we will earn from the contract. When we begin work on the contract and at the end of each accounting period, we estimate the labor, material, and other cost required to complete the statement of work compared to cost incurred to date. We use information provided by our technical team, project managers, vendors, outside consultants and others to develop our cost estimates. Since our contracts generally require some level of technology development to complete, the actual cost required to complete a statement of work can vary from our estimates. We have developed processes that allow us to reasonably estimate the cost to complete a contract. Historically, we have made only immaterial revisions in the estimates to complete the contract at each reporting period. Recognized revenues are subject to revisions as the contract progresses to completion and actual revenue and cost become certain. Revisions in revenue estimates are reflected in the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become known. In the future, revisions in these estimates could significantly impact recognized revenue in any one reporting period. The U.S. government can terminate a contract with us at any time for convenience. If the U.S. government cancels a contract, we would receive payment for work performed and costs committed to prior to the cancellation.

We recognize losses, if any, as soon as identified. Losses occur when the estimated direct and indirect costs to complete the contract exceed unrecognized revenue. We evaluate the reserve for contract losses on a contract-by-contract basis.

We recognize contract revenue for prototype units and evaluation kits for development work upon acceptance or the expiration of the acceptance period, when there is sufficient evidence of an arrangement, the selling price is fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured.

Cost of revenue

Cost of product revenue includes the direct and allocated indirect costs of manufacturing products sold to customers. Direct costs include labor, materials and other costs incurred directly in the manufacture of these products. Indirect costs include labor and other costs associated with operating our manufacturing capabilities and capacity.

Cost of contract revenue includes both the direct and allocated indirect costs of performing on development contracts and producing prototype units and evaluation kits. Direct costs include labor, materials and other costs incurred directly in performing on a contract or producing prototype units and evaluation kits. Indirect costs include labor and other costs associated with operating our research and development department and building our technical capabilities and capacity. Cost of contract revenue is determined by the level of direct and indirect costs incurred, which can fluctuate substantially from period to period.

Our overhead, which includes the costs of procuring, inspecting and storing material, and facility and depreciation costs, is allocated to inventory, cost of product revenue, cost of contract revenue, and research and development expense based on the level of effort supporting production or research and development activity.

Concentration of credit risk and sales to major customers

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk are primarily cash equivalents, investment securities available-for-sale and accounts receivable. We typically do not require collateral from our customers. Our investment policy generally directs investment managers to select investments to achieve the following goals: preservation of principal, adequate liquidity and return. As of December 31, 2011, our cash and cash equivalents and investments securities portfolio are comprised of short-term highly rated money market savings accounts and equity investments.

38


As of December 31, 2009, we held $3.0 million par value student loan auction rate securities (SLARS), fair valued at approximately $2.7 million. In March and December 2010, one of the issuers redeemed a total of $200,000 of our SLARS at par value through a voluntary lottery redemption program. In December 2010, we sold our remaining SLARS for $2.4 million, resulting in a realized loss of $127,000 during the period. As of December 31, 2010, all of our total cash and cash equivalents and investment securities available-for-sale had variable interest rates or were equity investments traded in active markets.

Concentration of Sales to Major Customers

During 2011, two commercial customers accounted for 20% of our total revenue and three commercial customers accounted for 53% of our accounts receivable balance at December 31, 2011. During 2010, one commercial customer accounted for approximately 26% of total revenue and the same customer accounted for 62% of the accounts receivable balance at December 31, 2010. During 2009, the U.S. government accounted for approximately 43% of total revenue, with two government customers accounting for 24% and 17%, respectively, of total revenue. The U.S. government accounted for approximately 37% of the accounts receivable balance at December 31, 2009.

Income taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for differences between the financial statement and tax bases of the assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future, based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense is recorded for the amount of income tax payable for the period increased or decreased by the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities during the period.

Net loss per share

Basic net loss per share is calculated using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the periods. Net loss per share assuming dilution is calculated using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and the dilutive effect of all potentially dilutive securities, including common stock equivalents and convertible securities. Net loss per share assuming dilution is equal to basic net loss per share because the effect of dilutive securities outstanding during the periods including options and warrants computed using the treasury stock method, is anti-dilutive.

As of December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, we excluded the following convertible securities from diluted net loss per share as the effect of including them would have been anti-dilutive. The shares shown represent the number of shares of common stock which would be issued upon conversion in the respective years.

      December 31,
      2011     2010     2009
Publicly traded warrants     753,000     753,000     753,000
Options and private warrants     2,498,000     1,381,000     1,586,000
Nonvested equity shares     132,000     57,000     50,000
      3,383,000     2,191,000     2,389,000

Research and development

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

Long-lived assets

We evaluate the recoverability of our long-lived assets when an impairment is indicated based on expected undiscounted cash flows. We recognize impairment of the carrying value of long-lived assets, if any, based on the fair value of such assets.

39


Share-based compensation

We have one share-based incentive compensation plan. The plan is more fully described in Note 12.

We use the straight-line attribution method to allocate the fair value of share-based compensation awards over the requisite service period for each award. The following table shows the amount of share-based employee compensation expense included in the statements of operations for each period shown:

      Year Ended December 31,
      2011     2010     2009
Cost of contract revenue   $ 143,000    $ 29,000    $ 101,000 
Cost of product revenue     136,000      42,000      18,000 
Research and development expense     1,329,000      1,343,000      1,213,000 
Sales, marketing, general and administrative expense     1,648,000      1,994,000      1,956,000 
    $ 3,256,000    $ 3,408,000    $ 3,288,000 

New accounting pronouncements

In May 2011, the FASB issued a new accounting standard on fair value measurements that clarifies the application of existing guidance and disclosure requirements, changes certain fair value measurement principles and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued a new accounting standard on the presentation of comprehensive income. The new standard requires the presentation of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The new standard also requires presentation of adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statement where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. The standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within these years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

3. Long-term contracts

Cost and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts comprises amounts of revenue recognized on contracts that we have not yet billed to customers because the amounts were not contractually billable at December 31, 2011 and 2010. The following table summarizes when we will be contractually able to bill the balance as of December 31, 2011 and 2010.

            Year Ended December 31,
            2011     2010
Billable within 30 days         $ 63,000    $ 130,000 
Billable between 31 and 90 days              
Billable after 90 days           7,000      7,000 
          $ 70,000    $ 137,000 

Our current contracts with the U.S. government are primarily cost-plus-fixed-fee type contracts. Under the terms of a cost-plus-fixed-fee contract, the U.S. government reimburses us for negotiated actual direct and indirect cost incurred in performing the contracted services. We are not obligated to spend more than the contract value to complete the contracted services. The period of performance is generally one year. Each of our contracts with the U.S. government can be terminated for convenience by the government at any time. To date, the U.S. government has not terminated a contract with us.

40


The following table summarizes the costs incurred on our revenue contracts:

            December 31,
            2011     2010
Costs and estimated earnings incurred on uncompleted contracts         $ 1,822,000    $ 3,266,000 
Billings on uncompleted contracts           (1,908,000)     (3,210,000)
          $ (86,000)   $ 56,000 
                   
Included in accompanying consolidated balance sheets under the following captions:
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted                  
     contracts         $ 70,000    $ 137,000 
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted                  
     contracts           (156,000)     (81,000)
          $ (86,000)   $ 56,000 

4. Cash equivalents, investment securities, available-for-sale, and fair value measurements

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, the authoritative guidance establishes a three level fair value inputs hierarchy, and requires an entity to maximize the use of observable valuation inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. We use market data, assumptions and risks we believe market participants would use in measuring the fair value of the asset or liability, including the risks inherent in the inputs and the valuation techniques. The hierarchy is summarized below.

Level 1 - Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Observable inputs such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not sufficiently active to qualify as Level 1 or, other inputs that are observable by market data.

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which requires us to develop our own assumptions, which are significant to the measurement of the fair values.

As of December 31, 2011, our cash and cash equivalents and investments available-for-sale securities portfolio are comprised of short-term highly rated money market savings accounts and an equity investment with a quoted price in an active market. Prior to December 31, 2010, our investment securities were comprised of debt securities and equity investments. Generally, they were issued by the U.S. government, its agencies, corporations, and student loan financial aid organizations. Accounting for these investments is discussed in Note 2.

Prior to December 2010, we held student loan auction-rate securities (SLARS), fair valued at $2.7 million. During 2010, we redeemed a total of $200,000 of our SLARS at par value through a voluntary lottery redemption program and sold our remaining SLARS for proceeds of approximately $2.4 million.

The valuation inputs hierarchy classification for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below as of December 31, 2011 and 2010. These tables do not include cash held in our money market savings accounts.

41


As of December 31, 2011:     Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total
Assets                        
     Corporate equity securities   $   $ 8,000    $   $ 8,000 
    $   $ 8,000    $   $ 8,000 
                         
As of December 31, 2010:     Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total
Assets                        
     Corporate equity securities   $   $ 13,000    $   $ 13,000 
    $   $ 13,000    $   $ 13,000 

The corporate equity securities are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using inputs and common methods with sufficient levels of transparency and observability. Because these securities are traded on the OTC market with lower average trading volumes we have deemed them not sufficiently active to qualify as Level 1.

Our investments are summarized below as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

                              Classification on Balance Sheet
                                    Investment
      Cost/     Gross     Gross                 Securities,
      Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Estimated     Cash     Available-
      Cost     Gains     Losses     Fair Value     Equivalents     For-Sale
As of December 31, 2011:                                    
     Assets                                    
          Corporate equity securities   $ 43,000    $   $ (35,000)   $ 8,000    $   $ 8,000 
    $ 43,000    $   $ (35,000)   $ 8,000    $   $ 8,000 
                                     
                              Classification on Balance Sheet
                                    Investment
      Cost/     Gross     Gross                 Securities,
      Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Estimated     Cash     Available-
      Cost     Gains     Losses     Fair Value     Equivalents     For-Sale
As of December 31, 2010:                                    
     Assets                                    
          Corporate equity securities   $ 43,000    $   $ (30,000)   $ 13,000    $   $ 13,000 
    $ 43,000    $   $ (30,000)   $ 13,000    $   $ 13,000 

As of December 31, 2011, the unrealized losses on our investments in equity securities were due primarily to declines in the pricing of these securities.

Our significant nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are subject to consideration for recognition and disclosure at fair value in the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis primarily include property and equipment, capital lease obligations, a tenant improvement loan agreement and deferred rent. If we conclude there has been an event indicating the potential impairment of a nonfinancial asset or liability, or periodically if no such indicating event is deemed to have occurred, we determine the fair value, test for impairments, and record significant impairments, in the period of determination.

The maturities of the investment securities available-for-sale as of December 31, 2011 are shown below:

      Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Estimated
      Cost     Gains     Losses     Fair Value
Maturity date:                        
     Less than one year   $ 43,000    $   $ (35,000)   $ 8,000 
     Due in 1-3 years                    
    $ 43,000                $ 8,000 

42


5. Inventory

Inventory consists of the following:

            December 31,
            2011     2010
Raw materials         $ 2,741,000    $ 3,924,000 
Finished goods                                                           1,513,000      2,151,000 
          $ 4,254,000    $ 6,075,000 

The inventory at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consisted of raw materials primarily for our accessory pico projectors and PicoP display engine, and finished goods primarily composed of our accessory pico projectors. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined on a net realizable value basis. Management periodically assesses the need to provide for obsolescence of inventory and adjusts the carrying value of inventory to its net realizable value when required. In addition, we reduce the value of our inventory to its estimated scrap value when management determines that it is not probable that the inventory will be consumed through the normal course of business during the next twelve months. In 2011, 2010, and 2009, we recorded inventory write-downs of $1.6 million, $9.6 million, and $1.3 million, respectively.

6. Accrued liabilities

Accrued liabilities consist of the following:

            December 31,
            2011     2010
Bonuses         $ 1,214,000    $ 649,000 
Payroll and payroll taxes           590,000      629,000 
Compensated absences           508,000      647,000 
Deferred rent credit           261,000      373,000 
Warranty           490,000      227,000 
Adverse purchase commitments                                   134,000      341,000 
Accelerated rent expense           402,000     
Professional fees           415,000      391,000 
Purchased patents           330,000      220,000 
Other           769,000      658,000 
          $ 5,113,000    $ 4,135,000 

7. Property and equipment, net

Property and equipment consists of the following:

            December 31,
            2011     2010
Production equipment         $ 5,144,000    $ 4,749,000 
Leasehold improvements           3,344,000      3,317,000 
Computer hardware and software/lab equipment           8,917,000      8,802,000 
Office furniture and equipment           1,485,000      1,591,000 
            18,890,000      18,459,000 
Less: Accumulated depreciation           (16,543,000)     (14,290,000)
          $ 2,347,000    $ 4,169,000 

Depreciation expense was $2.4 million, $1.7 million, and $1.1 million, in 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively.

43


8. Intangible assets

Our intangible assets consist entirely of technology-based purchased patents. The patents are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated period of benefit, ranging from one to 17 years. The gross value of our intangible assets was $2.3 million, $2.3 million, and $58,000 as of December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively. Amortization expense was $184,000, $32,000, and $2,000 in 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively. We estimate that we have no significant residual value related to our intangible assets and no material impairments of intangible assets were identified during any of the periods presented.

In October 2010, we entered into an agreement to purchase a patent portfolio containing 195 patents and patents pending from Motorola, Inc. to complement our current portfolio of pico projection and display patents. Under terms of the agreement we issued approximately 104,000 shares of MicroVision common stock in October 2010, made a cash payment of $220,000 in June 2011 and are obligated to make a final cash payments of $330,000 in June 2012.

The following table outlines the estimated future amortization expense related to intangible assets held at December 31, 2011:

Year ended December 31,           Amount
2012         $ 184,000 
2013           184,000 
2014           184,000 
2015           184,000 
2016 and thereafter                                                           1,312,000 
Total         $ 2,048,000 

9. Committed equity financing facility

In August 2010, we entered into a committed equity financing facility (CEFF) with Azimuth Opportunity, Ltd., ("Azimuth"), under which we may sell to Azimuth up to the lesser of $60.0 million or 2,221,488 of our shares of common stock over a 24-month term, which began on September 9, 2010. During 2011, we completed two draws from this facility and raised a total of $5.6 million in gross proceeds from the sale of approximately 557,000 shares of our common stock. In consideration for Azimuth's execution and delivery of the purchase agreement, we paid Azimuth $150,000 in cash and 8,047 shares of our common stock. In July 2011, we cancelled this facility.

In May 2011, we entered into a CEFF with Azimuth, under which we may sell to Azimuth up to the lesser of $40.0 million or 2,627,304 of our shares of common stock over a 24-month term, which began on July 8, 2011. In August 2011, we raised $1.5 million before placement agent and other issuance costs from the sale of approximately 203,000 shares of our common stock. In November 2011, we cancelled this facility.

In September 2011, we entered into a CEFF with Azimuth, under which we may sell to Azimuth up to the lesser of $35.0 million or 2,753,842 of our shares of common stock over a 24-month term, which began on September 13, 2011. In September 2011, we raised $5.0 million before placement agent and other issuance costs from the sale of approximately 955,000 shares of our common stock. In November 2011, we cancelled this facility.

Reedland Capital Partners acted as placement agent under each of these CEFFs and received a fee for its services equal to 1% of the aggregate dollar amount of common stock purchased by Azimuth upon settlement of any draw under the facilities.

44


10. Common stock

In November 2011, we raised approximately $10.5 million, before issuance costs of approximately $925,000, through an underwritten public offering of 2.2 million shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 1.3 million shares of our common stock. Details of the warrants are described below in Note 11.

During 2011, we also raised approximately $12.1 million, before issuance costs of $635,000, through the sale of approximately 1.7 million shares of our common stock under our 2010 and 2011 committed equity financing facilities.

During 2010, we raised approximately $22.4 million, before issuance costs of $768,000, through the sale of approximately 1.6 million shares of our common stock under our 2010 committed equity financing facility.

In November and December 2009, we raised an aggregate of $33.1 million, before issuance costs of $2.3 million, through underwritten public offerings of 1.4 million shares of our common stock.

In June 2009, we raised approximately $15.0 million, before issuance costs of approximately $218,000, from the sale of 1.0 million shares of common stock and warrants to purchase approximately 252,000 shares of our common stock to Max Display Enterprises Limited, a subsidiary of Walsin Lihwa. Walsin Lihwa is the parent company of Touch Micro-system Technology Corp. (TMT). We have worked for a number of years with both Walsin Lihwa and TMT, as manufacturers of our Micro-Electrical Mechanical systems (MEMS) chips. Based on filings by Max Display Enterprises Limited with the Securities Exchange Commission, as of December 31, 2011, Max Display Enterprises Limited beneficially owned 7.3% of our common stock, as determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities Exchange Commission.

11. Warrants

In November 2011, we raised approximately $10.5 million, before issuance costs of approximately $925,000, through an underwritten public offering of 2.2 million shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 1.3 million shares of our common stock. The warrants have an exercise price of $6.24 per share, a five year term, and are exercisable on the date of issuance.

In June 2009, we raised approximately $15.0 million, before issuance costs of approximately $218,000, from the sale of 1.0 million shares of common stock and warrants to purchase approximately 252,000 shares of our common stock to Max Display Enterprises Limited, a subsidiary of Walsin Lihwa. The warrants have an exercise price of $17.48 per share, a three year term, and are exercisable on the date of issuance. We can call the warrants if the average closing bid price of our stock is over $69.92 for any 20 consecutive trading days.

45


The following summarizes activity with respect to MicroVision common stock warrants during the three years ended December 31, 2011:

            Warrants to     Weighted
            purchase     average
            common     excercise
            shares     price
Outstanding at December 31, 2008           1,189,000    $ 34.56 
Granted:                  
     Exercise price greater than intrinsic value           252,000      17.52 
Exercised           (142,000)     27.68 
Canceled/expired                
Outstanding at December 31, 2009           1,299,000      31.68 
Granted:                  
     Exercise price greater than intrinsic value               -  
Exercised               -  
Canceled/expired           (257,000)     55.20 
Outstanding at December 31, 2010           1,042,000      25.84 
Granted:                  
     Exercise price greater than intrinsic value           1,278,000      6.24 
Exercised               -  
Canceled/expired           (33,000)     22.08 
Outstanding at December 31, 2011           2,287,000    $ 14.96 
                   
Exercisable at December 31, 2011           2,287,000    $ 14.96 

The following table summarizes information about the weighted-average fair value of MicroVision common stock warrants granted for the periods shown:

      Year Ended December 31,
      2011     2010     2009
Exercise price greater than fair value   $ 2.06    $ -     $ -  
Exercise price equal to fair value     -       -       -  
Exercise price less than fair value     -       -       10.16 

There were no warrants issued during 2010. We estimated the fair value of our common stock warrants on the respective grant dates using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 2011 and 2009, respectively: dividend yield of zero percent for both years; expected volatility of 83% and 75%; risk-free interest rates of 1.0% and 1.5% and expected lives of 5 and 3 years, respectively.

46


The following table summarizes information about our common stock warrants outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2011:

      Warrants outstanding     Warrants exercisable
            Weighted                  
      Number     average     Weighted     Number     Weighted
      outstanding at     remaining     average     excercisable at     average
      December 31,     contractual     excercise     December 31,     excercise
Range of exercise prices     2011     life (years)     price     2011     price
                               
$6.24     1,278,000      4.88    $ 6.24      1,278,000    $ 6.24 
$17.48     253,000      0.47      17.48      253,000      17.48 
$27.36     3,000      0.12      27.36      3,000      27.36 
$28.80     753,000      1.56      28.80      753,000      28.80 
$6.24-$28.80     2,287,000                  2,287,000       

12. Share-based compensation

We use the straight-line attribution method to allocate the fair value of share-based compensation awards over the requisite service period for each award. The valuation of and accounting for share-based awards includes a number of complex and subjective estimates. These estimates include, but are not limited to, the future volatility of our stock price, future stock option exercise behaviors, estimated employee turnover and award forfeiture rates.

As part of our 2011 plan to conserve cash used in operations, we implemented two share-based compensation programs during the second quarter of 2011 under which we issued shares of our common stock as compensation instead of cash. We have allocated the expense related to these programs to various financial statement lines consistent with the method used for allocating all share-based compensation.

In May 2011, we issued 52,000 shares of our common stock as incentive awards to non-executive employees under the 2006 Incentive Plan. The shares were valued using our closing stock price on the date of grant. We expensed $560,000 of share-based employee compensation for these awards at grant.

In June 2011, we implemented a voluntary program in which certain non-executive senior professional employees could elect to receive a portion of their 2011 salary in stock instead of cash. During 2011, we issued 136,000 shares of our common stock under the 2006 Incentive Plan as payment of salary. The shares were valued using our closing stock price on the date of grant. The total share-based compensation expense for these awards was $998,000, for service completed during 2011.

Description of Incentive Plans

The Company currently has two share-based incentive plans. The 2006 Incentive Plan described below is administered by the Board of Directors, or its designated committee ("Plan Administrator"), and provides for various awards as determined by the Plan Administrator. In June 2008, we determined not to issue additional options from a second share-based incentive plan, the Independent Director Stock Option Plan described below.

47


The 2006 Incentive Plan has 2.1 million shares authorized, of which 609,000 shares were available for awards as of December 31, 2011. The 2006 Incentive Plan permits granting non-qualified stock options (NSOs), incentive stock options (ISOs), stock appreciation rights, restricted or unrestricted stock, deferred stock, other share-based awards, or cash awards to employees, officers, directors and certain non-employees of the Company. Any award may be a performance-based award. Awards granted under the 2006 Incentive Plan have generally been to employees under non-qualified stock option agreements with the following provisions: exercise prices greater than or equal to the Company's closing stock price on the date of grant; vesting periods ranging from three years to four years; expiration 10 years from the date of grant; and optionees who terminate their service after vesting have a limited time to exercise their options (typically three to twelve months).

The Independent Director Stock Option Plan (IDSOP) has 113,000 shares authorized, of which 88,000 are issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2011. The IDSOP permits granting NSOs to independent directors of the Company. Grants awarded under the IDSOP generally have the following terms: exercise price equal to the Company's closing stock price on the date of grant, expiration 10 years from the date of grant, and vested grants remain exercisable until their expiration dates if a director leaves the Board. In June 2008, the Company shareholders approved an amendment to the 2006 Incentive Plan described above to allow non-employee directors to participate in the plan. The Company does not intend to issue additional options from the IDSOP.

Options Valuation Methodology and Assumptions

We use the Black-Scholes option valuation model to determine the fair value of options granted and use the closing price of our common stock as the fair market value of our stock on that date.

We consider historical stock price volatilities, volatilities of similar companies and other factors in determining estimates of future volatilities.

We use historical lives, including post-termination exercise behavior, publications, comparable company estimates, and other factors as the basis for estimating expected lives.

Risk free rates are based on the U.S. Treasury Yield Curve as published by the U.S. Treasury.

The following table summarizes the weighted-average valuation assumptions and weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted during the periods shown below:

      Year Ended December 31,  
      2011     2010     2009  
Assumptions (weighted average)                    
Volatility     85%     84%     75%  
Expected term (in years)     4.0      4.3      5.1   
Risk-free rate     1.3%     2.0%     2.0%  
Expected dividends     0.0%     0.0%     0.0%  
Pre-vest forfeiture rate     7.5%     5.0%     5.0%  
Grant date fair value of options granted   $ 6.10    $ 16.19    $ 9.62   

48


Options Activity and Positions

The following table summarizes activity and positions with respect to options for the year ended December 31, 2011:

                  Weighted      
                  Average      
            Weighted     Remaining      
            Average     Contractual     Aggregate
            Exercise     Term     Intrinsic
Options     Shares     Price     (years)     Value
Outstanding as of December 31, 2008     875,000    $ 31.84      7.2    $ 63,000 
Granted      249,000      15.76             
Exercised     (42,000)     20.64             
Forfeited or expired     (43,000)     24.08             
Outstanding as of December 31, 2009     1,039,000      28.72      7.0      4,823,000 
Granted      220,000      25.68             
Exercised     (30,000)     15.92             
Forfeited or expired     (137,000)     38.64             
Outstanding as of December 31, 2010     1,092,000      27.20      5.9      96,309 
Granted      121,000      10.00             
Exercised     (5,000)     15.12             
Forfeited or expired     (244,000)     31.60             
Outstanding as of December 31, 2011     964,000    $ 24.00      5.8    $
                         
Vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2011     946,000    $ 24.16      5.7    $
                         
Exercisable as of December 31, 2011     716,000    $ 26.72      5.0    $

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009 were $12,000, $185,000, and $455,000, respectively.

The total grant date fair value of options vested during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, was $4.1 million, $4.1 million, and $1.6 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2011, our unamortized share-based compensation was $2.0 million which we plan to amortize over the next 2.1 years.

In March 2011, we issued 85,000 nonvested equity shares of the Company's common stock to executive employees. These shares vest conditionally upon completion of certain service and performance objectives by June 30, 2014. The nonvested equity shares were valued at fair value on the date of grant and the share-based compensation expense will be amortized over the service period.

In April 2010, we issued 11,000 nonvested equity shares of the Company's common stock to executive employees under the 2006 Incentive Plan.

In April 2009, we issued 36,000 nonvested equity shares of the Company's common stock to executive employees under the 2006 Incentive Plan. Included was a grant of 21,000 shares to one executive which vests conditionally upon completion of certain service and performance objectives the later of three years from the date of grant or the first day thereafter that the executive is not in a closed window, and 2,000 shares to the same executive in lieu of a cash salary increase which vested in four equal installments through December 31, 2009. The remaining shares vest over a three year period from the date of grant. The nonvested equity shares were valued at fair value on the date of grant and the share-based compensation expense will be amortized over the service period.

As of December 31, 2011, our unamortized nonvested equity share-based compensation was $655,000 which we plan to amortize over the next 1.9 years.

49


13. Receivables from related parties

Our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2011 includes $409,000 from a sale of PicoP engines to Walsin Lihwa Corporation which integrated the engines into its product sold in China during 2011, compared to revenue of $39,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010 from the sale of evaluation kits to this customer. Our accounts receivable balance at December 31, 2011 included $159,000 remaining due from this customer, compared to $30,000 at December 31, 2010. Based on filings with the SEC as of December 31, 2011, Walsin Lihwa beneficially owns approximately 7.3% of our common stock as determined in accordance with SEC rules, through its wholly owned subsidiary Max Display Enterprises Limited.

14. Commitments and contingencies

Litigation

We are subject to various claims and pending or threatened lawsuits in the normal course of business. We are not currently party to any legal proceedings that management believes are reasonably possible to have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Lease commitments

We lease our office space and certain equipment under noncancelable capital and operating leases with initial or remaining terms in excess of one year.

We entered into a 90 month facility lease that commenced in February 2006. The lease includes extension and rent escalation provisions over the 90 month term of the lease. Rent expense will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

Future minimum rental commitments under capital and operating leases for years ending December 31 are as follows:

      Capital     Operating
      leases     leases
2012   $ 62,000    $ 938,000 
2013     62,000      564,000 
2014     21,000     
2015        
2016        
Thereafter        
Total minimum lease payments     145,000    $ 1,502,000 
             
Less: Amount representing interest     (34,000)      
Present value of capital lease obligations     111,000       
Less: Current portion     (39,000)      
Long-term obligation at December 31, 2011   $ 72,000       

The capital leases are collateralized by the related assets financed and by security deposits held by the lessors under the lease agreements. The cost and accumulated depreciation of equipment under capital leases was $987,000 and $942,000, respectively, at December 31, 2011 and $1,106,000 and $1,043,000, respectively, at December 31, 2010.

Net rent expense was $1,156,000, $860,000, and $862,000 for 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively.

50


Long-term debt

During 2006, we entered into a loan agreement with the lessor of our corporate headquarters in Redmond to finance $536,000 in tenant improvements. The loan carries a fixed interest rate of 9% per annum, is repayable over the initial term of the lease, which expires in 2013, and is secured by a letter of credit. The balance of the loan was $160,000 at December 31, 2011.

Adverse purchase commitments

We have periodically entered into noncancelable purchase contracts in order to ensure the availability of materials to support production of our PicoP based products and bar code scanners. We periodically assess the need to provide for impairment on these purchase contracts and records a loss on purchase commitments when required. During 2011, no losses on purchase commitments were recorded. During 2010, we recorded a loss of $220,000 to cost of product revenue as a result of commitments to purchase materials for the SHOWWX that were in excess of our estimated future proceeds from sale of the SHOWWX. In December 2009, we recorded a loss of $55,000 to cost of product revenue as a result of commitments to purchase materials for the ROV scanner that were in excess of its estimated future proceeds from the sale of the ROV scanners.

15. Income taxes

A provision for income taxes has not been recorded for 2011, 2010, and 2009 due to the valuation allowances placed against the net operating losses and deferred tax assets arising during such periods. A valuation allowance has been recorded for all deferred tax assets. Based on our history of losses since inception, the available objective evidence creates sufficient uncertainty regarding the realizability of the deferred tax assets.

At December 31, 2011, we have net operating loss carry-forwards of approximately $283.2 million, for federal income tax reporting purposes. In addition, we have research and development tax credits of $5.8 million. The net operating loss carry-forwards and research and development credits available to offset future taxable income, if any, will expire in varying amounts from 2017 to 2031 if not previously utilized. In 2011, $2.1 million in net operating loss carry-forwards expired. The research and development tax credits and the remaining net operating losses are scheduled to expire between 2017 and 2031. In certain circumstances, as specified in the Internal Revenue Code, a 50% or more ownership change by certain combinations of our stockholders during any three-year period would result in limitations on our ability to utilize our net operating loss carry-forwards. We have determined that such a change occurred during 1996 and the annual utilization of loss carry-forwards generated through the period of that change will be limited to approximately $1.6 million.

51


Deferred tax assets are summarized as follows:

      December 31,
      2011     2010
Deferred tax assets, current            
     Reserves   $ 4,395,000    $ 4,281,000 
     Other     806,000      853,000 
Total gross deferred tax assets, current     5,201,000      5,134,000 
             
Deferred tax assets, noncurrent            
     Net operating loss carryforwards     97,156,000      88,425,000 
     R&D credit carryforwards     5,754,000      5,428,000 
     Depreciation/amortization deferred     26,510,000      24,956,000 
     Other     6,958,000      5,815,000 
Total gross deferred tax assets, noncurrent     136,378,000      124,624,000 
             
Deferred tax liabilities, noncurrent            
     Convertible debt        
Total gross deferred tax liabilities, noncurrent        
Net deferred taxes before valuation allowance     141,579,000      129,758,000 
Less: Valuation allowance     (141,579,000)     (129,758,000)
Deferred tax assets   $   $

The valuation allowance and the research and development credit carry forwards account for substantially all of the difference between our effective income tax rate and the Federal statutory tax rate of 34%.

Certain net operating losses arise from the deductibility for tax purposes of compensation under nonqualified stock options equal to the difference between the fair value of the stock on the date of exercise and the exercise price of the options. For financial reporting purposes, the tax effect of this deduction when recognized is accounted for as a credit to shareholders' equity.

We did not have any unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2011 and at December 31, 2010.

We recognize interest accrued and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense. During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, we recognized no interest or penalties.

We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various states. The tax years 2008-2010 generally remain open to examination by major taxing jurisdictions in the United States to which we are subject.

16. Retirement savings plan

We have a retirement savings plan that qualifies under Internal Revenue Code Section 401(k). The plan covers all qualified employees. Contributions to the plan by the Company are made at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

Under the plan, we match 50% of employee contributions to the plan up to 6% of the employee's per pay period compensation. During 2011, 2010, and 2009 we contributed $242,000, $349,000, and $369,000, respectively, to the plan under the matching program.

52


17. Subsequent event

A 1:8 reverse stock split of MicroVision's common stock became effective on February 17, 2012 and reduced the number of shares of our common stock issued and outstanding from approximately 136.1 million to approximately 17.0 million. We amended our Certificate of Incorporation on February 17, 2012 in order to effect the reverse stock split, and on a post-split basis, reduce the number of authorized shares of our common stock from 200,000,000 to 100,000,000 and maintain 25,000,000 authorized shares of our preferred stock. The effects of the reverse stock split have been reflected in the financial statements and the footnotes.

18. Quarterly financial information (Unaudited)

The following table presents our unaudited quarterly financial information for the years ending December 31, 2011 and 2010:

      Year Ended December 31, 2011
      December 31,     September 30,         June 30,             March 31,    
Revenue   $ 1,504,000    $ 1,839,000    $ 1,155,000    $ 1,119,000 
Gross margin (loss)     (2,922,000)     (881,000)     (2,225,000)     (1,420,000)
Net loss     (9,806,000)     (7,790,000)     (9,175,000)     (9,037,000)
Net loss per share basic and diluted   (0.62)     (0.57)     (0.69)     (0.70)
                         
      Year Ended December 31, 2010
      December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     March 31,
Revenue   $ 683,000    $ 1,301,000    $ 2,088,000    $ 668,000 
Gross margin (loss)     (6,782,000)     (2,811,000)     (1,270,000)     (619,000)
Net loss     (15,420,000)     (11,850,000)     (11,073,000)     (9,117,000)
Net loss per share basic and diluted   (1.27)     (1.06)     (1.00)     (0.82)

MICROVISION, INC.
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES SCHEDULE
(in thousands)

            Additions            
      Balance at     Charges to     Charges to           Balance at
      beginning of     costs and     other           end of
Description     fiscal period     expenses     accounts     Deductions     fiscal period
     Year Ended December 31, 2009                              
          Allowance for receivables from related parties   $ 1,851    $   $   $ (1,451)   $ 400 
          Tax valuation allowance     99,206          14,100          113,306 
                               
     Year Ended December 31, 2010                              
          Allowance for receivables from related parties     400                  400 
          Tax valuation allowance     113,306          16,452          129,758 
                               
     Year Ended December 31, 2011                              
          Allowance for receivables from related parties     400                  400 
          Tax valuation allowance     129,758          11,821          141,579 

53


ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

There have been no changes in or disagreements with accountants in accounting or financial disclosure matters during the Company's fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and the Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), prior to the filing of this Form 10-K. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, as of December 31, 2011, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

(b) Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on its evaluation under the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2011.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their attestation report, which is included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading "Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm."

(c) Changes in internal controls over financial reporting. There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2011 which have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

Information regarding executive officers is included in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K in Item 4A. The information required by this Item and not provided in Item 4A will appear under the caption "Discussion of Proposals Recommended by the Board" in the Proxy Statement, which section is incorporated in this Item by reference. The Proxy Statement will be filed prior to our 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders'.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

The information required by this Item will appear under the captions "Executive Compensation," "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" and "Director Compensation for 2011" in the Proxy Statement, which sections are incorporated in this Item by reference.

54


ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

Information as of December 31, 2011 regarding equity compensation plans approved and not approved by stockholders is summarized in the following table:

      Equity Compensation Plan Information
      Number of     Weighted-     Number of securities
      securities to be     average exercise     remaining available for
      issued upon     price of     further issuance under
      exercise of     outstanding     equity compensation
      outstanding     options, warrants     plans (excluding
      options, warrants     and rights     securities reflected in
      and rights           column (a))
Plan Category     (a)     (b)     (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders     964,000    $ 24.00      609,000 
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders     3,000      27.36     
     Total     967,000    $ 24.01      609,000 

In February 2007, MicroVision issued a warrant to purchase 3,000 shares of common stock to a third party for services. The warrant was immediately exercisable, had an exercise price of $27.36 per share, and expired in February 2012. The shares and exercise price are as adjusted for the reverse stock split discussed in this annual report.

The other information required by this Item will appear under the caption "Information About MicroVision Common Stock Ownership" in the Proxy Statement, which section is incorporated in this Item by reference.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

The information required by this Item will appear under the captions "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" and "Board Meetings and Committees" in the Proxy Statement, which sections are incorporated in this Item by reference.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

The information required by this Item will appear under the caption "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in the Proxy Statement, which section is incorporated in this Item by reference.

55


PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) Documents filed as part of the report:

Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010

Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Valuation and Qualified Accounts and Reserves for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009

(b) Exhibits

The following exhibits are referenced or included in this report.

3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of MicroVision, Inc., as amended (9)

3.2

Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of MicroVision, Inc.(14)

3.3

Bylaws of MicroVision, Inc. (2)

4.1

Form of Specimen Stock Certificate for Common Stock.(2)

4.2

Form of Warrant issued under the Placement Agency Agreement dated as of July 18, 2008 by and between MicroVision, Inc. and FTN Securities Corp., as representative of the several placement agents named therein. (7)

4.3

Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 4, 2011, by and between MicroVision, Inc. and Azimuth Opportunities Ltd. (11)

4.4

Warrant Agreement dated November 16, 2011 by and between MicroVision, Inc. and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, LLC.(13)

10.1

Assignment of License and Other Rights between The University of Washington and the Washington Technology Center and the H. Group, dated July 25, 1993.(1)

10.2

Project II Research Agreement between The University of Washington and the Washington Technology Center and MicroVision, Inc., dated October 28, 1993.(1)+

10.3

Exclusive License Agreement between The University of Washington and MicroVision, Inc., dated October 28, 1993.(1)+

10.4

Exclusive License Agreement between the University of Washington and MicroVision, Inc. dated March 3, 1994.(4)

10.5

MicroVision, Inc. 2006 Incentive Plan, as amended. (6)*

10.6

Independent Director Stock Option Plan, as amended.(3)*

10.7

Employment Agreement between MicroVision, Inc. and Alexander Y. Tokman dated April 7, 2009.(10)

10.8

Lease Agreement between CarrAmerica Reality Operating Partnership, L.P. and MicroVision, Inc., dated July 15, 2005.(5)

10.9

Registration Rights Agreement dated June 22, 2009 by and between the Company and Max Display Enterprises Limited(9)

10.10

Warrant No. 120 to Purchase Common Stock of MicroVision, Inc. issued June 22, 2009 to Max Display Enterprises Limited(9)

10.11

Common Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 4, 2011, by and between MicroVision, Inc. and Azimuth Opportunities Ltd. (11)

56


10.12

Engagement Letter, dated as of May 4, 2011, by and between MicroVision, Inc. and Reedland Capital Partners.(11)

10.13

Common Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 13, 2011, by and between MicroVision, Inc. and Azimuth Opportunities Ltd. (12)

10.14

Engagement Letter, dated as of September 13, 2011, by and between MicroVision, Inc. and Reedland Capital Partners.(12)

10.15

Change of Control Severance Plan.

23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

31.1

Principal Executive Officer certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

Principal Financial Officer certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1

Principal Executive Officer certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2

Principal Financial Officer certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS**

XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase

101.DEF**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

101.LAB**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase

101.PRE**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

(1) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form SB-2 Registration Statement, Registration No. 333-05276-LA.
(2) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Post-Effective Amendment to Form S-3 Registration Statement, Registration No. 333-102244.
(3) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002.
(4) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 5, 2003.
(5) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005.
(6) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008.
(7) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 18, 2008.
(8) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
(9) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
(10) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
(11) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 6, 2011.
(12) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 13, 2011.
(13) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 15, 2011.
(14) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 17, 2012.

+

Subject to confidential treatment.

*

Management contracts and compensatory plans and arrangements required to be filed as exhibits pursuant to Item 15(b) of this Report.

**

Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability.

57


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

   

MICROVISION, INC.

Date: March 8, 2012

By

Alexander Tokman
Alexander Tokman
President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the following capacities on March 8, 2012.

Signature

Title

/s/ Alexander Tokman
Alexander Tokman

Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)

   

/s/ Jeff Wilson
Jeff Wilson

Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

   

/s/ Richard A. Cowell
Richard A. Cowell

Director

   

/s/ Slade Gorton
Slade Gorton

Director

   

/s/ Jeanette Horan
Jeanette Horan

Director

   

/s/ Perry Mulligan
Perry Mulligan

Director

   

/s/ Brian Turner
Brian Turner

Director

58


EXHIBIT INDEX

The following documents are filed herewith or have been included as exhibits to previous filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are incorporated by reference as indicated below.

3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of MicroVision, Inc., as amended (9)

3.2

Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of MicroVision, Inc.(14)

3.3

Bylaws of MicroVision, Inc. (2)

4.1

Form of Specimen Stock Certificate for Common Stock.(2)

4.2

Form of Warrant issued under the Placement Agency Agreement dated as of July 18, 2008 by and between MicroVision, Inc. and FTN Securities Corp., as representative of the several placement agents named therein. (7)

4.3

Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 4, 2011, by and between MicroVision, Inc. and Azimuth Opportunities Ltd. (11)

4.4

Warrant Agreement dated November 16, 2011 by and between MicroVision, Inc. and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, LLC.(13)

10.1

Assignment of License and Other Rights between The University of Washington and the Washington Technology Center and the H. Group, dated July 25, 1993.(1)

10.2

Project II Research Agreement between The University of Washington and the Washington Technology Center and MicroVision, Inc., dated October 28, 1993.(1)+

10.3

Exclusive License Agreement between The University of Washington and MicroVision, Inc., dated October 28, 1993.(1)+

10.4

Exclusive License Agreement between the University of Washington and MicroVision, Inc. dated March 3, 1994.(4)

10.5

MicroVision, Inc. 2006 Incentive Plan, as amended. (6)*

10.6

Independent Director Stock Option Plan, as amended.(3)*

10.7

Employment Agreement between MicroVision, Inc. and Alexander Y. Tokman dated April 7, 2009.(10)

10.8

Lease Agreement between CarrAmerica Reality Operating Partnership, L.P. and MicroVision, Inc., dated July 15, 2005.(5)

10.9

Registration Rights Agreement dated June 22, 2009 by and between the Company and Max Display Enterprises Limited(9)

10.10

Warrant No. 120 to Purchase Common Stock of MicroVision, Inc. issued June 22, 2009 to Max Display Enterprises Limited(9)

10.11

Common Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 4, 2011, by and between MicroVision, Inc. and Azimuth Opportunities Ltd. (11)

10.12

Engagement Letter, dated as of May 4, 2011, by and between MicroVision, Inc. and Reedland Capital Partners.(11)

10.13

Common Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 13, 2011, by and between MicroVision, Inc. and Azimuth Opportunities Ltd. (12)

10.14

Engagement Letter, dated as of September 13, 2011, by and between MicroVision, Inc. and Reedland Capital Partners.(12)

10.15

Change of Control Severance Plan.

23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

31.1

Principal Executive Officer certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

Principal Financial Officer certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1

Principal Executive Officer certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2

Principal Financial Officer certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

59


101.INS**

XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase

101.DEF**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

101.LAB**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase

101.PRE**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

(1) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form SB-2 Registration Statement, Registration No. 333-05276-LA.
(2) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Post-Effective Amendment to Form S-3 Registration Statement, Registration No. 333-102244.
(3) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002.
(4) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 5, 2003.
(5) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005.
(6) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008.
(7) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 18, 2008.
(8) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
(9) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
(10) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
(11) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 6, 2011.
(12) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 13, 2011.
(13) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 15, 2011.
(14) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 17, 2012.

+

Subject to confidential treatment.

*

Management contracts and compensatory plans and arrangements required to be filed as exhibits pursuant to Item 15(b) of this Report.

**

Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability.

60